I take it that the "worse consequence of sin", as per your defense, would be perpetual, conscient nihl.
Not because is a perpetual state neither because is conscious pursue of nihil. Because there are a lot of people pursuing nihil right now, they try really hard to accept this fate.
But there's a difference between here and Hell.
Here our souls are always nurtured with the presence of God giving us a chance.
In Hell this will cease. And this event will be the worse thing ever and will be fixed forever (in a state with a different time which for us is like an eternal moment).
You say, then, that the consequence of the metaphorical original sin is god not stopping the soul from falling into a default state of perpetual nihl.
True to people living after the crucifixion.
"Salvation", then, is god actively rescueing the soul from nihl, while "doom" is god denying the soul such intervention. Is this your belief?
Almost. The perdition must be intentional after proper discernment.
Lets leave aside the discussion about the existence of a "soul" and for the sake of discussion, assume that it simply exists.
That's the spirit! You finally understood my intention. I just want an intellectual conversation about Christianity. The merit if it's valid or not must be considered personally. But we can verify the logical consistency of the system. Because truth must be self consistent at least.
Let's also forget for a moment that none of what you describe as being your christian belief is backed by the Bible or by the teachings of Jesus or the apostles.
Strange... But let's try.