Thank you Atlantis
It is interesting to see how the doctrine of blood is still being emphasized as well as the monitoring that is being done so that proclaimers adhere without restrictions to this infamous interpretation of a text that is supposed to prohibit the use of blood to preserve one's life expectancy when it applies only to purely food use.
Although this heresy does not seem to disturb the followers who, moreover, talk about it without measuring its scope. They forget too easily that minors who join the group through their baptism (which is debatable on the presumed enlightened will of the said minor) and who have no idea what it means to die because they were taught or indoctrinated that it was forbidden to receive blood (including when hoping to resurrect) do they understand what it means: non-existence.
For young men and women under 18, death is not considered as a game from which one gets up once fallen. They have no idea what death means to them.
They know that people die but they are not affected by it unless it is their loved ones, because it is a moment of sadness that will be forgotten.
Except that in this case it is about them, about their lives which are placed in the hands of skilled manipulators without any compassion except one, this apparent compassion which they diffuse by their media or internally.
There is a difference between the so-called natural death or the one voluntarily chosen and the one resulting from an external influence that can lead to a premature end before its maturity linked to our mortal nature without the said influence being guilty of having been at the origin.
Should we let minors commit themselves to such risks?