as the story of "annointed" ones goes.....when their spouse is left behind on earth, are they free to remarry?
that would kinda suck, being in heaven...watching the wifey , or hubby gettin doinked by someone new.
just sayin.....shewt...i got way too much time on my hands..
Blondie: Were those angels seeking sex (since they were neither male nor female in heaven) or power/legacy of having children, forming their own tribe and rulership? I believe it was not sex but the latter, building up their families and power and rulership on earth, something they could not do in heaven unable to have offspring.
Hmmmm... Best observation yet in my opinion.
anyone ever seen pictures or the actual houses and cars the gb own?
im wondering if the live a middle class lifestyle or more like high society?
anyone ever seen pictures or the actual houses and cars the gb own?
im wondering if the live a middle class lifestyle or more like high society?
as the story of "annointed" ones goes.....when their spouse is left behind on earth, are they free to remarry?
that would kinda suck, being in heaven...watching the wifey , or hubby gettin doinked by someone new.
just sayin.....shewt...i got way too much time on my hands..
as the story of "annointed" ones goes.....when their spouse is left behind on earth, are they free to remarry?
that would kinda suck, being in heaven...watching the wifey , or hubby gettin doinked by someone new.
just sayin.....shewt...i got way too much time on my hands..
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/downloadfile.ashx?guid=7ba22716-556c-43c2-9fc6-76697afad440&type=exhibit&filename=wat.0001.004.0076&fileextension=pdf
i actually started clapping at that point, as his honour explained to the wt type creep sycophantic slithery lawyer that........" i understand that we all have issues to face in life and .....that is a part of life...........however it has become obvious that this man ....is in such a position to assist with this investigation.....".
it boils down to the fact that stewart outright accused the latest witness of misleading the royal commission and this lead to some document searches which led his honour to conclude that they had been protecting mr jackson.
this was a warm and fluffy moment folks.................brilliant stuff!!!!!
...is now on kindle with the paperback to follow soon.. thanks to you all for your contributions.
any questions, please pm me.. .
http://www.jw-archive.org/post/125844213823/geoffrey-jackson-declines-to-appear-before#at_pco=cfd-1.0&at_ab=per-15&at_pos=0&at_tot=14&at_si=55c27690475c6bb3
all jws on the stand have stuck to the same line that they have no problem with cooperating with mandatory reporting when state law requires it.. if the law does not require it then bible principles absolutely prevent them from taking away rights of the victim to report abuse to the police or not.. we have already heard from a jw rep a couple of days ago who proudly asserted that when the law conflicts with bible principle they will always obey the bible and quoted acts 5:29 "we must obey god rather than men".. please join the dots!.
