six,
snail by name and snail by nature, eh?
LPH
Lionel_P_Hartley
JoinedPosts by Lionel_P_Hartley
-
30
Darwin "shudder(s)" at the Design o...
by Escargot inasa gray, a famous harvard botany professor, who was to become a leading advocate of theistic evolution, wrote darwin expressing doubt that natural processes could explain the formation of complex organs such as the eye.
darwin expressed a similar concern in his return letter of february 1860.. the eye to this day gives me a cold shudder, but when i think of the fine known gradations [available through millions of years of evolution], my reason tells me i ought to conquer the cold shudder.
charles darwin, the life and letters of charles darwin, vol.
-
-
-
30
Darwin "shudder(s)" at the Design o...
by Escargot inasa gray, a famous harvard botany professor, who was to become a leading advocate of theistic evolution, wrote darwin expressing doubt that natural processes could explain the formation of complex organs such as the eye.
darwin expressed a similar concern in his return letter of february 1860.. the eye to this day gives me a cold shudder, but when i think of the fine known gradations [available through millions of years of evolution], my reason tells me i ought to conquer the cold shudder.
charles darwin, the life and letters of charles darwin, vol.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
Escargot,
You are the one who wrote that "evolution happened" so, presumambly, you agree with Darwin.
-
30
Darwin "shudder(s)" at the Design o...
by Escargot inasa gray, a famous harvard botany professor, who was to become a leading advocate of theistic evolution, wrote darwin expressing doubt that natural processes could explain the formation of complex organs such as the eye.
darwin expressed a similar concern in his return letter of february 1860.. the eye to this day gives me a cold shudder, but when i think of the fine known gradations [available through millions of years of evolution], my reason tells me i ought to conquer the cold shudder.
charles darwin, the life and letters of charles darwin, vol.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
six,
It is amazing how such self-described "lovers of truth" will so shamelessly distort another's words - it is just as case of defending God through lies which Job 13 warns against.
LPH
-
30
Darwin "shudder(s)" at the Design o...
by Escargot inasa gray, a famous harvard botany professor, who was to become a leading advocate of theistic evolution, wrote darwin expressing doubt that natural processes could explain the formation of complex organs such as the eye.
darwin expressed a similar concern in his return letter of february 1860.. the eye to this day gives me a cold shudder, but when i think of the fine known gradations [available through millions of years of evolution], my reason tells me i ought to conquer the cold shudder.
charles darwin, the life and letters of charles darwin, vol.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
Escargot,
Did you or did you not write "evolution happened?" Did you or didn;t you?
LPH
-
30
Darwin "shudder(s)" at the Design o...
by Escargot inasa gray, a famous harvard botany professor, who was to become a leading advocate of theistic evolution, wrote darwin expressing doubt that natural processes could explain the formation of complex organs such as the eye.
darwin expressed a similar concern in his return letter of february 1860.. the eye to this day gives me a cold shudder, but when i think of the fine known gradations [available through millions of years of evolution], my reason tells me i ought to conquer the cold shudder.
charles darwin, the life and letters of charles darwin, vol.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
Escargot wrote,
and I agree with that.evolution happened
LPH
-
30
Darwin "shudder(s)" at the Design o...
by Escargot inasa gray, a famous harvard botany professor, who was to become a leading advocate of theistic evolution, wrote darwin expressing doubt that natural processes could explain the formation of complex organs such as the eye.
darwin expressed a similar concern in his return letter of february 1860.. the eye to this day gives me a cold shudder, but when i think of the fine known gradations [available through millions of years of evolution], my reason tells me i ought to conquer the cold shudder.
charles darwin, the life and letters of charles darwin, vol.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
Escargot,
I forgot that you have no abilities at comprehension. Dawrin is saying - Just as it once seemed ridiculous to think that the Sun did not orbit the Earth, so too, it seems equally ridiculous to think that the eye could evolve. In fact, deeper consideration shows that both things, though not superficially obvious, are in fact the case. It just goes to show that what seems obvious is not only correct - do you get it now?
Or should I try it again using only words containing two syllables or less?
-
11
Do Creationists Publish in Reputable Journals?
by Escargot in(8) "convergence spaces and nonstandard compactifications," math.
(8) "convergence spaces and extensions of maps," math.
(9) "convergence spaces and perfect maps," math.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
Escargot,
Braindead doesn't even start to decsribe what you are. I am confident that you have no idea what the papers you quote are about. For example, what does:
(5) "A nonstandard approach to pseudotopological compactifications," Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math., 26(1980), 361-384.
have to do with CS? Why not go to your local Univ. library, read the paper, and then report back to us. OK?
Your moronic postings should be an embarrassment to you.
LPH
-
30
Darwin "shudder(s)" at the Design o...
by Escargot inasa gray, a famous harvard botany professor, who was to become a leading advocate of theistic evolution, wrote darwin expressing doubt that natural processes could explain the formation of complex organs such as the eye.
darwin expressed a similar concern in his return letter of february 1860.. the eye to this day gives me a cold shudder, but when i think of the fine known gradations [available through millions of years of evolution], my reason tells me i ought to conquer the cold shudder.
charles darwin, the life and letters of charles darwin, vol.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
Escargot,
That is a typically dishonest CS tactic, although you do say that Darwin "went on to speculate," but why not let him speak for himself. Are you worried about using Simon's disk space up?
To suppose that the eye [...] could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree.
[Let's look at the rest]
When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense of mankind declared the doctrine false; but
the old saying of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, cannot be trusted in science. Reason tells me, that if numerous
gradations from a simple and imperfect eye to one complex and perfect can be shown to exist, each grade being useful to its possessor,
as is certainly the case; if further, the eye ever varies and the variations be inherited, as is likewise certainly the case and if such
variations should be useful to any animal under changing conditions of life, then the difficulty of believing that a perfect and complex eye
could be formed by natural selection, though insuperable by our imagination, should not be considered as subversive of the theory.In that context Darwin's words are perfectly sensible.
-
11
Do Creationists Publish in Reputable Journals?
by Escargot in(8) "convergence spaces and nonstandard compactifications," math.
(8) "convergence spaces and extensions of maps," math.
(9) "convergence spaces and perfect maps," math.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
Escargot,
I asked for one paper on creation science - not one by someone who claims to be a creation scientist but publishes in other areas of science - in an independent, peer-reviewed scientific journal. IQCR, which is published by the Creation Research Institute is not independent, now is it? If you doubt what I asked you for go back and check what I said, for you quoted my words. You have not satisfied my crieria as the stuff you have found is not published in the journals meeting the standards I asked for, or is not CS. The consiracy theory is total nonsense.
But, even this is somewhat of a red herring, as I also pointed out before you found the paper from IQCR - what matters is the validity of what is said. The article you quoted claims that evolution violates the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics. It doesn't - this is one on the most ridiculously wrong arguments by creation "scientists" that is possible. On those grounds alone, the paper you supplied would be rejected by any independent, peer-reviewed scientific journal. That is not bias - it is just the scientific method in operation. Plenty of papers get turned down, even papers by Nobel prize winners. Creation science is not science because it assumes the answer before it starts the investigation. What it is is a vain attempt to make the data fit a preconceived idea. I pointed out a glaringly incorrect statement on one of your web pages and you simply ignored what I said, because, you don't care about actual truth, only what you believe to be truth. In that you are just like the WT since that seems to be the analogy of the day.
On top of it all, I would guess that you will believe anything that anyone says that supports your preconceived views. I'll bet I could write something, under the guise of a CS, that you would believe but which would be scientifically invalid. Have you ever criticized an idea that appears to support creation? That's why you are unable to defend your position - all you can do is muddy the waters and make appeals to authority. The closest you got to an answer in the evolution thread was to say that evidence might someday be discovered to support your views. As I said, that is the WTS's argument about 607 BCE.
LPH
-
12
Maid makes soup from her panties....
by ISP insounds fishy to me....... maids brief bid to control boss.
kuantan: an indonesian maid here allegedly boiled soup soaked with her underwear and served it to her employer.
unknown to her, her bizarre culinary work was recorded by a closed-circuit television camera installed by her employer, a businessman, in his jalan beserah house.
-
-
Lionel_P_Hartley
split pee soup?