Scholar:
Deviating slightly, but still related
I was at the Daniel book study (during the lunar eclipse i REALLY wanted to see and Im sure Jehovah wouldnt have minded a break in a study to see his WONDERFUL creation at work) and the 1914 was brought back up.
Now I had read somewhere why did they not take the three and a half times (1260 days) "a day for a year" as they did with the 7 times? I cannot get a reasonable explanation as to this from the book "Pay Attention to Daniels Prophecy"
What gives them the right to convert 7 times into 2,520 years, yet 3 1/2 times into 1,260 days? Which is right? Surely if they insist on using the Ezekiel scripture (Ezekiel 4:6, Numbers 14:34)
28 Since the "seven times" are prophetic, we must apply to the 2,520 days the Scriptural rule "A day for a year" - Pay Attention to Daniels Prophecy, Chapter 6
Therefore according to WT thinking, then the three and a half times should amount to 1,260 YEARS and not days as they say.
Also, just because of the similarities of the prophecy of the three and a half times (1260 days) in Daniel 7:25 and 12:7 doesnt mean that they are the same prophecy. Daniel 12:7 is referring to the Great Tribulation? and Daniel 7:25 is talking about harassment under the rule of the 4th beast. Are these two events the same? Again, the book is cleverly avoiding the subject and answering with trickery.
Either that or Im just one of the bad guys not able to understand the "Truth" due to being evil and set aside for destruction, a goat.
Edited by - logical on 11 January 2001 12:59:55