Hello Lee Elder,
I wish to tell you that I do agree with your last post:
1. Neither Furuli nor the WTS can answer the simple questions we have raised.
2. It is fitting and proper for Jehovah's Witnesses to discuss this policy outside of the organization.
3. Physicians who ask JWs simple questions about the policy will find they are stumped and may reevaluate their position.
*…the record clearly shows that even very experienced JW elders who are HLC (Hospital Liaison Committee) members (like Furuli) cannot answer simple questions about a policy they expect other JWs to die for if necessary. " …..(very, very true)!
*Where has Furuli shown that claims made by AJWRB are false?
Where is the logical basis for calling our claims "exaggerated?"
Once again we're treated to another round of Furuli's logical fallacies."
*I dare say that Furuli's lack of response to the issues will answer any remaining questions in the minds of physicians regarding the lack of autonomy of their JW patients. With Furuli and the WTS, it's their way or the highway. "
*…he would really prefer that they just identify themselves so that he can disfellowship them for not agreeing with him about what blood (haima) is this week. Lest we forget, he may once again change his mind next week and six million JWs will have to fall in line with the latest definition or face shunning and destruction by God."
Excellent comments, by the way I have downloaded the all debate , and I'm going through
very page, since I do really believe that the vast majority of b&s , are not at all * informed
the way they should, and they constantly puzzled by the "new light" and changes from the
WTS on the "blood issue" . A final word from me: " Keep up with the excellent work"
you and the others with you…and a great, great THANK YOU * to Dr. Muramoto.
Agape, J.C.MacHislopp
PS. Thanks to JanH…I do like your illustration!