steve2,
I almost forgot about the atomic bomb. But that was an extension of WWII.
WWIII would take up where WWII ended - widespread use of nuclear weapons.
june 28 1914 archduke ferdinand was killed by a serbian government sponsored assassination team.. this was the trigger event of world war i. actually some have called it world war (part 1) followed less than 30 years later by world war (part 2).. in retrospect this was a useful date for jw's.. it has propelled them for 100 years.. of course jw's have massaged their predictions about the significance of 1914 over the years.. do you feel that jw's would be what they are today without that great war?
do you think that the shooting down of the passenger plane over east ukraine will be an equivalent moment that pushes putin into a corner where he will have to fight the west?
in other words will we look back on that event as the beginning of world war (part 3)?.
steve2,
I almost forgot about the atomic bomb. But that was an extension of WWII.
WWIII would take up where WWII ended - widespread use of nuclear weapons.
june 28 1914 archduke ferdinand was killed by a serbian government sponsored assassination team.. this was the trigger event of world war i. actually some have called it world war (part 1) followed less than 30 years later by world war (part 2).. in retrospect this was a useful date for jw's.. it has propelled them for 100 years.. of course jw's have massaged their predictions about the significance of 1914 over the years.. do you feel that jw's would be what they are today without that great war?
do you think that the shooting down of the passenger plane over east ukraine will be an equivalent moment that pushes putin into a corner where he will have to fight the west?
in other words will we look back on that event as the beginning of world war (part 3)?.
jgnat:
Of course they aren't talking direct confrontation. You don't tell your enemy you are going to attack them. You just do it. Otherwise you lose a strategic advantage.
Pinker sits in an ivory tower. When powerful nations feel they are threatened they kill. World wide wars need world wide alliances.
If you attack the member of an alliance they will all join the fight. The attack on Iraq and Afghanistan was a coalition forming an ad hoc alliance.
It has happened recently and it can happen again.
june 28 1914 archduke ferdinand was killed by a serbian government sponsored assassination team.. this was the trigger event of world war i. actually some have called it world war (part 1) followed less than 30 years later by world war (part 2).. in retrospect this was a useful date for jw's.. it has propelled them for 100 years.. of course jw's have massaged their predictions about the significance of 1914 over the years.. do you feel that jw's would be what they are today without that great war?
do you think that the shooting down of the passenger plane over east ukraine will be an equivalent moment that pushes putin into a corner where he will have to fight the west?
in other words will we look back on that event as the beginning of world war (part 3)?.
June 28 1914 Archduke Ferdinand was killed by a Serbian government sponsored assassination team.
This was the trigger event of World War I
Actually some have called it World War (Part 1) followed less than 30 years later by World War (Part 2).
In retrospect this was a useful date for JW's.
It has propelled them for 100 years.
Of course JW's have massaged their predictions about the significance of 1914 over the years.
Do you feel that JW's would be what they are today without that Great War?
Do you think that the shooting down of the passenger plane over East Ukraine will be an equivalent moment that pushes Putin into a corner where he will have to fight the west? In other words will we look back on that event as the beginning of World War (Part 3)?
can't...tear...my...eyes...away.... .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zx8db7m5mzq.
Some meanings of a pinkie ring:
"Wearing a ring on the little, or pinky, finger of the hand can have any one of a number of meanings, some of which are mutually contradictory. It may also have no other significance at all beyond the personal preference of the wearer.
Homosexuality
In the 1950s through the 1970s, wearing a pinky ring was sometimes used as a covert sign of male homosexuality. Judy Grahn in her book "Another Mother Tongue" writes that in 1959, the year she came out, that rings worn on the pinky were known as a secret way to communicate homosexuality.
Engineers
American and Canadian engineers sometimes wear a steel or iron ring to signify oath-bound membership in an engineering fellowship.
Signet Rings and Aristocracy
The signet ring, a type of ring bearing a family crest and used to seal letters and mark other documents, was traditionally worn on the little finger. As a result, rings worn on the little finger became associated with aristocracy in general.
Organized Crime
Members of organized crime are reputed to wear pinky rings as well. In more recent times, hip-hop artists with a "gangsta" style adopted pinky rings in imitation of their Italian-American counterparts.
Luck
Some people believe that wearing a pinky ring can bring the wearer luck. Gamblers, in particular, are prone to sporting one."
Source:
"Another Mother Tongue;" Judy Grahn; 1984
Order of the Engineer
The Iron Ring
"The New York Times;" Ba-Da-Bing! Thumbs Up for the Pinkie Ring; Jan. 23, 2000
My personal belief is that Letts pinkie ring is an old secret decoder ring he got in a Kracker Jack Box
when he was 7 years old. He believes it explains the scriptures to him.
Jehovah put him in his position to test his people.
Out of courtesy to him they shouldn't have a guy like that anywhere near a microphone. It is like poking fun of a hunchback.
personally i believe we are.. your thoughts?.
how will it turn out?.
what can/should we do?.
You simply cannot ignore the change that nuclear weapons have brought about.
You may be able to eradicate a disease and confine it to a single sample in a test tube.
But you can't eradicate the people who know how to make nuclear weapons.
We forget that the USA used nuclear weapons 69 years ago because they felt that it was better for Japanese civilians to die than American Soldiers.
The world ISN'T the same.
this topic has been discussed before but it is interesting to look at it in the light of the new book god's kingdom rules.. 1903 news paper sermons.
1914 photo drama of creation.
1922 radio.
I don't know if my original post was clear.
The list of methods and years they were introduced is a direct quote from the new book.
i have always had bonkers dreams and i remember a lot of them, even some from my childhood.
i have the common dreams of flying and being chased all the time.
and i used to dream about demons but not for a very long time.. but heres the thing, i often dream that i've been captured and about to be tortured or murdered and the rest of my dream is about me negotiating my freedom and promising all sorts of things if they will only let me go free.
When I was interested in Fritz Perls Gestalt Therapy I used to find his method of analysis useful.
He felt that everything in the dream is YOU. You are the prisoner and the captor.
You might want to create a dialog between the prisoner and the captor.
Captor: "I'm not going to let you go"
Prisoner: "Please... Let.. Me... Go"
This is a classical Top Dog-Underdog scenario.
You need to identify with the power side and figure out what or who you refuse to let go.
Who or what are you clinging to.
Eventually you will realize that you have the power to abandon your captor and take its power back into yourself.
You need to identify your imaginary security tied up with your captor. There is something in your life that you want to free yourself from and at the same time you are afraid of losing your security.
All dreams come down to varieties of this dilemma. You need your enemies for something.
this topic has been discussed before but it is interesting to look at it in the light of the new book god's kingdom rules.. 1903 news paper sermons.
1914 photo drama of creation.
1922 radio.
Sir82:
Right about radio. TV pushed radio out completely by 1955.
Although they have occasionally used TV it was as Blondie mentioned in connection with a convention.
If you were to poll JW's you probably wouldn't find many that have seen a JW TV presentation. Certainly nothing worth of their claimed mission. Especially when you compare it with Pat Robertson's empire.
I suppose the angel in mid heaven could always make the rocks talk as a last resort.
this topic has been discussed before but it is interesting to look at it in the light of the new book god's kingdom rules.. 1903 news paper sermons.
1914 photo drama of creation.
1922 radio.
This topic has been discussed before but it is interesting to look at it in the light of the new book God's Kingdom Rules.
1903 News Paper Sermons
1914 Photo Drama of Creation
1922 Radio
1933 Sound Cars
1936 Placard Work
1954 Motion Pictures
1990 Videos
1997 Internet
2011 Metropolitan Witnessing
What ever happened to TV? TV is still the main source of information for the worlds population.
They skipped over TV. Didn't Jehovah like TV?
Or was he still making up his mind when according to wikipedia:
In 1961, M.G. "Pat" Robertson , son of Virginia United States Senator A. Willis Robertson and an attorney-turned- Southern Baptist minister, purchased the dormant channel 27 license. Under the ownership of Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network , the station returned to the air on October 1 as WYAH-TV , with "YAH" standing for " Yahweh " according to some sources (including Pat Robertson's autobiography, Shout it From the Housetops )
There you have it. Jah's first TV station 1961.
What would the Watchtower look like if they would have broadcast 24-7 around the world with their own satellite or even leased time on a satellite?
Look at how they segue into the internet.
Page 74 of (kr-E) "As the 20th century drew to a close, radio no longer played a primary role in spreading the good news. However another technology emerged that made it possible to reach an audience of unprecedented size"
if the ultimate goal is to reach as many people as possible with the kingdom message, why does the society find it necessary to block any public access to the new dvd?.
could it be because the public will see how vacuous their teachings are?
producing this propaganda is a new low even for them.
All the talk about the JW love affair with technology.
I am just recovering from the 3 day weekend in fantasyland.
I loved the big screen. Gave us a chance to see the "frowning" up close.
I was mesmerised. I couldn't take my eyes off these speakers. There was a complete disconnect between their facial expressions and what they were trying to say.
The incessant jabbing of meaningless emphatic gestures. The absense of descriptive gestures. Give them W's on both.
It also looked like they attended seminars on finger "bullet points".
I filled my iphone with pictures of speakers going through their 5 points holding up the approprite fingers for each point.
I saw a lot of note takers so that must have made them happy. Each time the appropriate fingers went up there was a flurry of writing.
I loved the babies. I enjoyed looking at the cute teenage mothers who married the only oaf available in their northwoods congregation.
I tried to pick out the young people who were attending for their last time. Also saw a lot of old people that were attending for their last time.