:::::::::::think it's great to have a forum provided by Simon to be able to express ourselves, and even get carried away at times. However, to try and bring the lurkers in on this seems to stretch it.
Becky, To me "lurkers" is the only issue. I am not offended by anything I've seen/read here. BUT I have many times cringed when I've read something and hoped that no one in search of information saw it. That's all I've thought. I haven't made a value judgements about the person who made the comments.
::::::::: They would be totally responsible for looking at boobs.
I spose I think that naked boobs belong on a naked boob site. At least if dubbie men go there they can't use convoluted reasoning to say that apostates are depraved. Not that they will address the issue of why they themselves are looking at a porn site.
::::::::::I do think we want to help them, but I also think we shouldn't have to be afraid of what the jw's think--I thought we left fear behind us. Our wanting to help jw's who lurk shouldn't supercede our freedom of expression.
Well, we can't help everyone. It would require a vast clean up of a lot of the things posted here. And I don't feel the forum would be that much fun if that were the case. It seems we should let the dice fall where it will. Dutchie raised a great subject for debate, but the bottom line is; THE LAW OF DEMINISHING RETURNS. Too much effort for too little return.
My hope is that Dutchie isn't too wounded by the debate. I think it's been an extremely healthy discussion and I wish I could post something that would evoke so much interest.