I see you walking the narrow path kate ol' pal, ol' buddy.... But still, what do you mean science is LAME without religion. Science just tells you HOW to look for things, you are talking about the actual THING being observed, that isnt science, thats ...the thing! Science is a set of instructions, its not the table. When we use science to measure how far a star is from us, you can't call the method lame without religion... and science is the method, not the star! There should be NO emotion in the science, that is why the method was invented, to remove human intuition and to turn it into math, a probability of 'x' being true.
For me, science is FREE without religion....just ask Galileo.
Science won't be accurate if we attach a 'with' to its results, the inevitible bias would result in dismissing important answers, or worse, dismissing important questions. One may conclude it would likely lead to some very...'dark ages'.