snare&racket

Joined

• started 227 topics
• posted 3,997 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by snare&racket

• 
  38

  University Application Personal Statement dilemma - Should I mention my jw past?

  by will-be-apostate in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am applying to chemical engineering course in the uk through ucas (a lot of things changed since i've posted last time).. i have a lot of skills i developed while regular pioneering, like public speaking skills, ability to reason (even if it's bs), presentational skills etc.. i feel it would boost my personal statement a lot, but i'm also afraid they would say "this guy beleives in god, and loves science, he must be creationist.

  away with him".. how could i mention that i gave interviews front of thousands of people and did voluntary work in my hometown without giving a bad impression?.

  i don't want to go into details and start explaining myself that "however i don't beleive in god", or something like that.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  Get some hobbies quick 😁
• 
  4

  Evolution isn't happening right now?

  by rebel8 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  woman: professor haldane, even given the billions of years that you say were available for evolution, i simply cannot believe it is possible to go from a single cell to a complicated human body with its trillions of cells organized into bones and muscle and nerves, a heart that pumps without ceasing for decades, miles and miles of blood vessels and kidney tubules, and a brain capable of thinking and feeling.

  .

  haldane: but madam, you did it yourself!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  Many miss this point, it is an old reference and it is to do with time alone really. It is in no way comparing evolution itself to the development of a human, but illistrates early difficulties with evolution, namely the concept of the potenial of change over time,it was just so inconceivable. Yet this quote reminded everyone that not only was it conceivable but witnessed and in far less time than billions of years. It is an excellent point he made.

  Obviously he is not stating that a human developing is evidence for evolution.
• 
  37

  Most Jdubs are nice people, not really evil - give us all a break from this

  by hamsterbait in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  The very same can be said for mormons, scientologists, muslims, hindus, buddhists, atheists.....It says nothing of whether it is true or not.

  As for the individual members, I have never seen a judgmental or vindictive attitude towards them.here. It wouldn't make sense as we were once members and many people we love and miss remain members.

  Going a little deeper, I respect and would defend with my all, the right for everytone to have free thoughts a free mind and opinions. This is very differe t ti respecting the opinion itself. Do not mistake lack of respect for an opinion, for lack of respect for a person or people.

  Likewise I find it difficult when JW's and believers vocalise issues they have evidently read nothing about and reject data out of hand due to their world view. If I was to not care about that person, I may move on without a word spoken, not caring what they believe or have researched. However, I could out of considerstion pause to discuss the issue , for which some intepret as confrontational.

  Sometimes it is a lose-lose scenario when personal belief is being discussed.
• 
  4

  Evolution isn't happening right now?

  by rebel8 in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  woman: professor haldane, even given the billions of years that you say were available for evolution, i simply cannot believe it is possible to go from a single cell to a complicated human body with its trillions of cells organized into bones and muscle and nerves, a heart that pumps without ceasing for decades, miles and miles of blood vessels and kidney tubules, and a brain capable of thinking and feeling.

  .

  haldane: but madam, you did it yourself!

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  Indeed.....

  I used to dismiss the mechanisms of evolution as improbable and illogical....... aka...... I was ignorant to basic biology!
• 
  128

  900 Top Scientists Sign Statement Skeptical of Macro-Evolution

  by Perry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  we are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural .

  selection to account for the complexity of life.

  careful examination of the .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  Despite only writing one line of text, you used the word "me". How selfish .........

  It is an honest form of communication to speak from the "I", your perspective, allowing the reader to know it is merely your view of the world. You write as if an authority, quite different.

  Perry is either willingly uninfirmed or a troll. Either way I don't reply in order to answer him. I reply because people come here and read these threads, even if Perry thinks this is all a grand joke or sincerely thinks ignorance is a sufficent response to evidence . Real people with real lives come here to look for answers because they are too afraid to vocalise or research them in real life. Threads like this are intellectually harmful and dishonest.

  The evidence for evolution is astounding. Perry and the governing body are left empty handed V's 200 yesrs of confirmation that the theory is reliable.
• 
  16

  Chlostridium difficile infectiion...

  by titch in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  i suppose that this question falls under the topic of "personal experiences.

  " so, i have a question for the members of the site: has anyone had any experience with a malady called "chlostridium dificille infection"?

  either yourself personally, or a relative or a friend?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  If you look at the research, one would have to consume an ocean of probiotic drinks and yoghurts to influence colony sizes, it is kind of an in joke with microbiologists. They all have very legalsitic writing on them as it is very ethically dodgy to claim they do anything and they are pricey!

  Vancomycin and metronidazole work well. It is unwise to see it as one being better than another, simply put, depending on the local genetic make up of the c-diff populations they wil be sensitive to one or both or neither, or others etc etc. Someone elses advice is not valuble to you.

  You need a poo sample taken, where they will match the antibiotic to the cdiff you have. This is how quickly bacteri are evolving.The species have evolved defences to drugs depending on what drugs are used locally in that area.

  If you are already on antibiotics, it is likely already done and the drug you have been given was chosen on what your sample was sensitive to i.e. what killed it in a petri dish.
• 
  38

  University Application Personal Statement dilemma - Should I mention my jw past?

  by will-be-apostate in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am applying to chemical engineering course in the uk through ucas (a lot of things changed since i've posted last time).. i have a lot of skills i developed while regular pioneering, like public speaking skills, ability to reason (even if it's bs), presentational skills etc.. i feel it would boost my personal statement a lot, but i'm also afraid they would say "this guy beleives in god, and loves science, he must be creationist.

  away with him".. how could i mention that i gave interviews front of thousands of people and did voluntary work in my hometown without giving a bad impression?.

  i don't want to go into details and start explaining myself that "however i don't beleive in god", or something like that.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  Lol BoC, I miss your honesty and straight forward spproach ;)
• 
  128

  900 Top Scientists Sign Statement Skeptical of Macro-Evolution

  by Perry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  we are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural .

  selection to account for the complexity of life.

  careful examination of the .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  Perry, a friend/parent/observer can be dissapointed snd ashamed with someone without being antisocial, narcissitic, and dysfunctional.

  I want you to see the evidence I have seen. It is so very frustrating to come back and see you still desperate to undermine something you can still not as yet even describe or define, evidence that you simply don't understand the theory.

  I have zero doubt, that if you understood the theory and saw the evidence, you would accept it as true. But deciding to not do so will result in you never having an objective, honest, appraisal on a topic you devote hours of effort to

  As a human, it is dissapointing and a little sad to observe such self constricting behaviour. It is imdeed a shame. If that seems psychologically bizzare to you, then no explination will suffice for your lack of appreciation for my perspective.

  I must end by saying. before you are tempted to hold this reply as a mirror up to me, I have researched and read every anti-evolution argument and issue I could find. I disagreed with and laughed at my first evolution lectures as an adult. I have stood your side of the fence, give my side a go, start by at least knowing what evolution is.
• 
  42

  What are the ODDS Jehovah's Witnesses are the ONLY TRUE religion?

  by Terry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the entire organization shoves all its chips into the center of the table on one bet: they are the only mouthpiece of god on earth.. what are the odds to this bet?.

  the statistic for christian denominations make jw's 1 out of 41,000 opinions.. a chance of 1 in 41 thousand is a tough bet.. _________________________.

  if abc tv broadcasts shark tank and your tv receives mister ed .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  Every single living thing and human that has ever existed......has died.

  Despite watching Witnesses getting old and die all their life, all of whom felt they never would, JW's will fully believe they are destined to not die.

  What are the odds?

  Odd is the word indeed.
• 
  128

  900 Top Scientists Sign Statement Skeptical of Macro-Evolution

  by Perry in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  we are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural .

  selection to account for the complexity of life.

  careful examination of the .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  snare&racket

  Scientists do not do party lines, you could not be more misinformed if you tried.

  Scientists hunt for gaps in 'the party line' aka the evidence and theories.

  Scientists pay their rent by finding faults and problems in theories.

  Over half of scientists are religious.

  If a scientist was to find A SINGLE piece of evidence against evolution, biology science would EXCITINGLY grind to a halt and they would get a Nobel prize for the finding.

  Perry if you even KNEW of a SINGLE piece of evidence proving evolutiin wrong,we would hear about it.

  You have it all ass backward because of your world beliefs.It is dissapointing to come back after all this time and see you still can't even define evolution Perry. Shame buddy. Have you not learned anything from your experience with Watchtower, arguments and opinions from authority are insignificant. A tiny number of 'scientists' (by what definition)of various expertise signing an a petition is simply....bizzare, a little embarassing and totally valueless.

  Evidence is the ONLY reliable guide.