Posts by outsmartthesystem

19

i hve conculded that All religions all mind controlling and the same..thy all hve 'issues' non is perfect...just pick one hope u dnt get to entangled in its webs..

by Chichi89 in

jw
friends

.

i think thy are all the same..th base logistics of how thy run thier affairs n worship is the same... thy ar all man made..all mind controlling..if religion is a big part of your life jus pick one and deal with its crap.coz its gonna be there.!.

.its jus not th jw,th catholics ,the muslims thy jews ,th mushroomming ministries th list in endles... am just sayin.

outsmartthesystem

Agreed, Punk......agreed. The thing that always gets me is that witnesses say......"oh I fear God.......but it isn't a morbid fear......it is one of reverence! I fear displeasing him." They try to liken it to a small boy having a reverential fear of displeasing his father.

Bullshit. My daughters don't want to displease me. But in the event they do.....they know that I will still always be there for them and that my love will never be withdrawn. On the other hand......displeasing God results in him killing you at Armageddon. Exactly how is that reverential fear and NOT morbid fear????????

16

What happened immediately after your Judicial Committee was over?

by civicsi00 in

whenever i went to my judicial committee (over 3 years ago), the elders opened with a prayer for jehbooboo's guidance.

then they followed up with their loyalty question, "do you believe in the faithful and discreet slave?".

of course i answered "no", and shortly thereafter i handed over my disassociation letter.

outsmartthesystem

For me, there were 3 elders on it. I had known them all for quite some time. Elder one was the COBE. He was very business like and shook my hand. Elder 2 is a hot headed Irishman who had to catch himself more than once during the proceedings......trying not to get angry at me. Elder 3 is a brand new elder and one of my former good friends. We used to cycle and play basketball together. Elder one, as I said kept it business like. Elder 2 stared away at the wall to keep from engaging me in argument. Elder 3.....during the proceeding asked me if had read the society's publications (Oct & Nov 2011 mags) regarding the 607 BC issue. I smiled politely and explained that those magazines, when the information provided within is cross referenced, raise more questions than they answer. In fact, the final 24 pages of my 607BC research are completely dedicated to those magazines. I offered to ask him some of the questions those magazines raised. He looked like he had seen a ghost. From that point on......he would not make eye contact with me.

After they announced that I would be DFd for apostasy.......I went and met mythreesons and a few others for a beer! Cheers!

42

JWgift.org - the UK's Watchtower-sponsored website that "should not be seen as the soliciting of funds in any way"...

by cedars in

...even though it has a massive button on the home page saying "make a donation.".

https://www.jwgift.org/welcome.aspx.

cedars.

outsmartthesystem

"This facility has been provided solely for the convenience of those who asked for this service and desire to support our work by these means."

So does this mean that if enough people ask for a collection plate to be passed around......they'll go ahead and do that too?

75

Anyone here been Dfd for 'apostacy'?

by Julia Orwell in

just wanna know.

i'm doing the fade but i reckon my big mouth could get me dfd.

i know plenty who've been dfd for fornication/adultery, but never met one dfd for speaking the truth.

outsmartthesystem

They have, they do and they will. I was DFd for apostasy last year. I spent almost 3 years researching the organization.....its history.....607BC.....1919 etc. I did so because my wife asked me to (I had doubts and she was sure that after researching.....I would come to the conclusion that this WAS God's one and only organization after all). When I tried to show her what I had discovered she flipped a switch and I became the enemy. She and her father turned me in to the elders. Not one of them (wife, FIL, elders) ever attempted to answer the litany of questions I had.

Obey or be cut off

47

Is it the GB's plan to NOT explain the nu FDS lite?

by outsmartthesystem in

perhaps i am overthinking this.......but i may have come to the conclusion that the gb's refusal to address and explain in detail all of the changes mentioned at the 2012 annual meeting is in and of itself.....their final explanation.

from what i have gathered by speaking discreetly with those that are still "in" but on the fringe.......the information given at the 2012 meeting meant practically nothing to most jws.

in fact.....most are still completely unaware of the changes.

outsmartthesystem

Damn u honey bucket. I will be humming that song the rest of the day

47

Is it the GB's plan to NOT explain the nu FDS lite?

by outsmartthesystem in

perhaps i am overthinking this.......but i may have come to the conclusion that the gb's refusal to address and explain in detail all of the changes mentioned at the 2012 annual meeting is in and of itself.....their final explanation.

from what i have gathered by speaking discreetly with those that are still "in" but on the fringe.......the information given at the 2012 meeting meant practically nothing to most jws.

in fact.....most are still completely unaware of the changes.

outsmartthesystem

Just as proverbs 4:18 says........the light shall be just bright enough to leave the rank and file in complete and utter confusion thus ensuring that they will cling ever tighter to us.........waiting.......and waiting.......and....

47

Is it the GB's plan to NOT explain the nu FDS lite?

by outsmartthesystem in

perhaps i am overthinking this.......but i may have come to the conclusion that the gb's refusal to address and explain in detail all of the changes mentioned at the 2012 annual meeting is in and of itself.....their final explanation.

from what i have gathered by speaking discreetly with those that are still "in" but on the fringe.......the information given at the 2012 meeting meant practically nothing to most jws.

in fact.....most are still completely unaware of the changes.

outsmartthesystem

Perhaps I am overthinking this.......but I may have come to the conclusion that the GB's refusal to address and explain IN DETAIL all of the changes mentioned at the 2012 Annual Meeting is in and of itself.....their final explanation. From what I have gathered by speaking discreetly with those that are still "in" but on the fringe.......the information given at the 2012 meeting meant practically NOTHING to most JWs. In fact.....most are still completely unaware of the changes. Most witnesses still believe that the FDS has been around since 33CE and that the FDS still refers to the "anointed".....though the "anointed" are represented by the members of the governing body. Most have no idea that the "slave" being appointed "over all his belongings" is still a future event.

And I think that is just the way the GB wants it. I think they may continue to leave it unexplained in print.....and slowly but surely over the coming years......the new "belief" will simply trickle down through word of mouth. District Overseers and Circuit Overseers will mention portions of it from the stage and in personal conversation.....elders will confirm......and Sister Faithful will simply hear about it through the grapevine. After several years it will be accepted by JWs that this is the new understanding. No one will question it......and several years after THAT.....it will be a blur just like everything else is in their history. Individual JWs won't remember the exact article that explained the change (because it never existed).....but they won't care. Their memories will fade and eventually.....like all other understandings......they will simply believe it because that is what is now taught. They will assume that surely an article was written many years ago.......giving the explanation of why such changes were necessary, but they aren't going to look it up because it is too much work. Any that do look it up will of course find nothing. And those that are concerned about that will either be told to "continue waiting on Jehovah" or they will be told "does it have to be in print in order for you to believe it? Are you saying that hearing it from the mouth of Jehovah's channel of communication isn't good enough?" The word of mouth explanation will eventually become so entrenched that the GB will be able to write entire articles about it......without EVER having to address its origin.

If they stall long enough......while at the same time.....continuing to mention the new belief structure......the sheeple will accept it and forget about their one time desire to understand WHY it changed.

Just my two rupees.

11

Can your child be too young to learn TTATT? Where would you start?

by DATA-DOG in

that is my dilema.

my child is wonderful, funny, smart, talented, cute, kind, and a social butterfly.

i want to see her happy.

outsmartthesystem

I would suggest the same as the folks before me. Find them good, honest "worldly" friends. That way they can see first hand that in most cases.....not only are "worldly" people not bad.....they are actually nicer than the "friends" they have at the kingdom hall.

Make sure they are NOT home schooled. As they see their friends at school celebrating their birthdays, getting into the Christmas spirit, having a blast playing sports etc etc........they will see that these things aren't bad at all.

My children are 5 1/2 and 3 1/2. My soon to be ex wife is constantly barraging them with how bad birthdays and Christmas and magic etc are. When the kids are with her.....they lead a regimented life.....dominated by meeting attendance and service. When they are with me.......I give them choices. Yes.....I believe that 5 and 3 year olds should be given choices. With me......I tell them "it is up to you". For instance.....my oldest wants to have a birthday party. 3 months ago she was completely indoctrinated. But kids have brains and curiosity. She asked me if I celebrate mine. I told her yes. She proceeded to tell me that Jehovah doesn't like that. I used basic reasoning with her. "Jehovah isn't happy I was born?" I asked. "I sure am happy YOU were born." She responded by saying "but birthdays put too much importance on one person (yes a 5 year old said this) and that is selfish". I said "but what about so and so's wedding you just went to. That day was all about them wasn't it?" She literally thought about it for a minute and said......."yeah.......so there's nothing wrong with birthdays?". I said "I don't think so". She promptly asked me if I would have a birthday party for her when she turns 6.

Even at such a young age......they are able to use basic reasoning. Combine that with her going to school now and she can see how normal kids are OUTSIDE of the kingdom hall. It is a desire for ALL kids to want to be normal. If you can catch them early......I think that TRUE love (not conditional love) and thinking skills will win out over forced indoctrination and fear.

34

Came clean to the wife and all is good!

by Comatose in

i have been reading steven hassan's books as well studying like never before.

my wife has seen the amount studying i am doing, just hasnt known what all subjects instudy.

over the last few weeks i've slowly shared certain things.

outsmartthesystem

Wow. That is incredible after just a short amount of time! Congrats to you

66

Still Waiting For the Governing Body To Explain Their New Light

by Cameron_Don in

jw
friends

regarding the governing bodys new light relative to matthew 24:45-47, anointedjw.org recently said the following:.

this new light certainly poses a problem for the governing body.

perhaps this is another reason why they have not yet published a sober and scriptural xplanation of this new light.

outsmartthesystem

There is a part of me that wonders how much of their own bullshit they believe. I honestly wonder if they came up with the new light......and then said "let's go ahead and make the announcement.......the holy spirit will direct the explanation later".