I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy
I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy
All around in my home town
They're trying to track me down
They say they want to bring me in guilty
For the killing of a deputy
For the life of a deputy
But I say:
I shot the sheriff, but I swear it was in self-defense
I shot the sheriff, and they say it is a capital offense
It makes my head spin like an old LP when I think back and remember some of the differences in my thinking when I was a Witness compared to my post theocratic evolution. There is probably no better example of a defining difference than my attitude back then and current views now of breaking the LAW.
Sheriff John Brown always hated me
For what I don't know
Every time that I plant a seed
He said, "Kill it before it grows"
He said, "Kill it before it grows"
I say:
I shot the sheriff, but I swear it was in self-defense
I shot the sheriff, but I swear it was in self-defense
I remember once getting hauled on the carpet when I was pioneering because of my driving habits. Yeah, I admit it, I was a real ?Jehu? back then (remember the wild and reckless driver of Biblical reference?) and I got ratted out by someone who watched me driving like a wild man coming back from an assembly. The verbal tongue lashing droned on and on about my duty to stop at every stop sign, even if it was way out in the middle of nowhere, to never speed, never run a red light and so on. The only time I was to break the law of course was to further Organizational principles?yeah we all know that line.
Freedom came my way one day
And I started out of town
All of a sudden I see sheriff John Brown
Aiming to shoot me down
So I shot, I shot him down
I say:
I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy
I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy
Well all that B.S. is now history. I don?t give a rat?s ass about anything the Watchtower Society thinks my duty is but am I justified in feeling that way towards the culture I live in? Namely, am I supposed to obey all their laws? Hell NO. I think it is a duty to deliberately break some unjust and harmful laws.
It doesn?t take a rocket scientist to see things are really screwed up in many Western countries, especially the United States. We make it illegal now to carry nail clippers in airports because they might be used as a weapon. Last year, Oregon firefighters were not allowed to tackle a large forest fire in a region designated a wilderness area, and endangering the homes of 17,000 people. Politicians are always finding new rationalizations for their favorite pastime, taking away our income. Police seize people?s computers just on the suspicion of holding porn. They can take DNA samples and fingerprints from anyone they arrest, even if not accused of any crime. There are laws allowing bureaucrats to seize and confiscate most of the assets of ?criminals? and this often means that in some states you lose your vehicle, boat, or home just for having smoked a little pot. Ever wonder what happens to you if you get busted with a joint in Alabama? Try life in prison.
Reflexes got the better of me
And what is to be must be
Every day the bucket goes to the well
But one day the bottom will drop out
Yes, one day the bottom will drop out
But I say:
I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy, oh no
I shot the sheriff, but I did not shoot the deputy, oh no
So, where do you draw the line? Is anything okay as long as it doesn?t hurt someone else? Is it just a matter of weighing the consequences of getting caught? Do you have a duty to break or at least protest against unjust laws or not?
Skipper