I have a theory on that...
In testifying before the Australian Committee, Governing Body member Jackson was asked:
"Do you [the GB] see yourselves as Jehovah God's spokespeople on earth?"
his answer was:
"Ah, that I think would seem to be quite presumptuous, to say that we [the GB] are the only spokesperson that God is using."
You know the JW lawyers were all over that testimony. They know full well that these child abuse cases can bring them to their knees financially and they want to anticipate and limit that future liability.
No one plays with words more than the "artful dodger JWs". So I think there must be some connection (in their minds at least) between needing to appear as though everything is coming straight from God to them as leaders of the religion while simultaneously being able to distance themselves from elders and others in positions of authority within the religion who abuse children.
They realize its too hard to defend a direct line between God -->Holy Spirit--->Governing Body----> local appointed men.
So they are breaking it up and waffling around the perceived libelous connections by statements like Jackson made above.
Other steps they have taken since then are
- Appointing elders locally under the direction of a Circuit Overseer rather than the headquarters
- Changing the wording about the Holy Spirit in the baptism questions.
So that is my theory on why we see such attention to "wordage" about the Holy Spirit by the JW leadership.