Great, we're threatening Russia now.
http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/03/12/sprj.irq.main/index.html
Source: Chile, Mexico are holdouts on Iraq
Official: U.S. still needs one vote on U.N. resolution
Wednesday, March 12, 2003 Posted: 10:49 AM EST (1549 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Bush administration believes that it is one vote shy of having nine of 15 votes needed on a U.N. Security Council resolution that sets a Monday deadline for Iraqi compliance, a senior U.S. State Department official said, and officials are focusing diplomatic energies on Mexico and Chile to secure their backing.
President Bush has spent much of the last week on the telephone, lobbying council members to support the resolution.
"Bush and [British Prime Minister Tony] Blair are attempting to do whatever it takes to get the Latins to commit," the official told CNN's Andrea Koppel.
Blair told members of the House of Commons on Wednesday that the council was considering a series of benchmarks that Iraq would have to meet to prove it was disarming -- a step that Chile and Mexico previously suggested.
The State Department official also said the United States is confident it has the support of the three African members of the Security Council -- Cameroon, Guinea and Angola -- despite a visit this week by French Foreign Minister Dominique de Villepin to secure their opposition to the resolution.
In addition, U.S. and Pakistani officials said Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf can be counted on for his support when a vote happens this week.
That leaves Mexico and Chile as holdouts, the State Department official said. To secure these votes, the United States, Great Britain and Spain have teamed up to work all the angles. On Tuesday, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell held a three-way conference call with his allied counterparts as they coordinated strategies.
Nevertheless, Russia and France have threatened to veto the resolution. Nine council votes are needed to pass the resolution, but a veto by any of the five permanent members would defeat it. Britain, France, Russia, China and the United States are permanent members.
Blair sets Iraqi benchmarks
British Prime Minister Tony Blair outlined a series of tests Wednesday that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein would have to meet to prove that he was complying with Security Council resolutions.
Blair told a raucous session of the House of Commons that the council was considering a number of benchmarks for Iraq that would be added to a new resolution.
These include handing over supplies of anthrax, or proving they were destroyed; allowing Iraqi scientists and their families to travel outside the country to be interviewed by inspectors; and accounting for unmanned drones that the United States and Britain say can be used to spray chemical or biological weapons.
"I believe if we set those conditions out clearly, if we back them by the will of a united United Nations, then we have a chance of even now of averting conflict," Blair said, "but what we must show is the determination to act if Saddam will not fully comply."
Blair also faced sharp questions from members of Parliament over comments from U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who said Tuesday that the United States might be prepared to go to war against Iraq without Britain.
Rumsfeld suggested the British force could be spectators -- taking up a peacekeeping role after a U.S. invasion to oust Saddam. (Full story)
When asked about those remarks, Blair said that the United States could act alone and that Britain would not take military action unless it was in its national interest.
But the prime minister confirmed British commitment to disarming Iraq and pushing for a new U.N. resolution.
"I believe it's important that we hold firm to the course," Blair said. "What's at stake here is not whether the United States goes alone, but whether the international community backs up clear instructions [to Iraq] with necessary action."
Blair accused those nations threatening to veto the new resolution of undermining world security and harming the unity of the United Nations.
U.S. warns Russia
In an interview with the Russian newspaper Izvestia, the U.S. ambassador to Russia warned Moscow that using its veto in the Security Council could have "consequences for our relations."
"There is a big difference between Russia's veto and abstention," said the ambassador, Alexander Vershbow. "Either step will be interpreted differently by the U.S. people and by the Congress. Russia should carefully weigh these consequences."
Vershbow outlined what is at stake: a "large agenda" that includes increased U.S. investment in Russia's energy sector, new forms of cooperation in national security, joint efforts in missile defense and the fight against terrorism and cooperation in space. In addition, Russia's relationship with NATO is bearing fruit, the diplomat said.
"It will be a shame," Vershbow said in the interview, "if progress in these areas will be postponed or even reversed because of serious differences over Iraq."
CNN Correspondents Jill Dougherty, John King, Andrea Koppel and Richard Roth and Producer Elise Labott contributed to this report. For latest developments, see CNN.com's Iraq Tracker.