Thanks DaCheech - that would be helpful to people who need to look something up.
morrisamb
JoinedPosts by morrisamb
-
22
Jehovah's Witnesses and... are my magazine's cover story
by morrisamb ini have been invisable here of late as i have so many projects on the go.
my magazine q has taken off here in london, canada.
each month i will have an overall theme...october's is faith and we'll be dealing with several different belief systems.
-
-
22
Jehovah's Witnesses and... are my magazine's cover story
by morrisamb ini have been invisable here of late as i have so many projects on the go.
my magazine q has taken off here in london, canada.
each month i will have an overall theme...october's is faith and we'll be dealing with several different belief systems.
-
morrisamb
It has been interesting to see the public's response to my mag. We've had unbelievable media attention. Interesting footnote: the client's lawyer for our cover story part 2 on the driver's licence issue is renowned Toronto human rights lawyer Clayton Ruby who has represented the Witnesses in blood issue cases in the past.
And all of the parties have requested copies of Q...even Witnesses have expressed interest.
Honestly, I haven't read Witness material OR ANY RELIGIOUS MATERIAL FROM ANY RELIGION in twenty years. Just for this cover story, I've had to read over some info. So I guess, never isn't always ever.
-
22
Jehovah's Witnesses and... are my magazine's cover story
by morrisamb ini have been invisable here of late as i have so many projects on the go.
my magazine q has taken off here in london, canada.
each month i will have an overall theme...october's is faith and we'll be dealing with several different belief systems.
-
morrisamb
Thanks guys ..it would be great to expand to Us...as it is, we only charge postage to mail subscriptions anywhere in the world
to subscribe: email and cc me: [email protected]
and me: [email protected]
Thanks!
-
22
Jehovah's Witnesses and... are my magazine's cover story
by morrisamb ini have been invisable here of late as i have so many projects on the go.
my magazine q has taken off here in london, canada.
each month i will have an overall theme...october's is faith and we'll be dealing with several different belief systems.
-
morrisamb
I have been invisable here of late as I have so many projects on the go. My magazine Q has taken off here in London, Canada.
Each month I will have an overall theme...October's is Faith and we'll be dealing with several different belief systems. (we also have lighter stuff; and we have in Oct a debate on both sides of the gay marriage issue).
But I've had a painting created for my cover for October which features Jehovah's Witnesses. It is awesome. It will be non-offensive to Witnesses. Our cover story highlights the blood issue and the case in Calgary but the cover story's theme has to do with Issues of Conscience. To that end the second part of the cover story deals with another denomation's issue with photos on driver's licences. Quite interesting case actually.
My magazine will not take a stand on the blood issue...we are presenting both sides of the story with quotes from both the father in the case and his lawyer and representatives of the Watchtower society.
Both sides appreciated the thoroughness of my writer and our desire to remain neutral. How much media coverage do you see that doesn't take a particular spin on an issue? Having access to much of the info on this case, I can tell you that a writer could spin this story in a bezillion directions.
my magazine (15,000 copies) is distributed to 500 locations in London, certain locations in St. Thomas, Kitchener, Stratford and Toronto - Second Cup; Zeldas; 501, Woodys.
our web site is http://www.qmagazine.ca
-
5
Did you ever wear high fashion like this...
by TresHappy in.
at your local kingdom hall?
if so, please post your favorites!.
-
morrisamb
You guys crack me up..that's my sister and mother...from 1980!!! You should see how my sister dresses now!
-
10
Dahmer's Parents on Larry King
by rem indid anyone see the larry king interview with jeffery dahmer's parents yesterday?
his father is a devout creationist and even converted jefferey to a creationist while he was in prison.
the interesting thing i thought, though, was the father's theory for why jeffery was able to commit those murders: because jeffery believed in evolution.
-
morrisamb
You know, I watched part of it..it was a repeat..it gave me a queasy feeling, you know what I mean...like get out the violins time.
I remember seeing the father on another show about his son (Investigative reports or something)...it was creepy seeing him talk nicely about his son, the murderer. At the very least, it's insensitive to the murdered victims' families.
I think his son was sick AND did know what he was doing. Meaning calculated murders.
-
21
Unbelievable abuse case in Canada!
by morrisamb inhere's today's story and below the column i wrote in response
caged boys say abusers' penalty too light
kevin connor, special to the london free press and news services july 6/04
-
morrisamb
You are so right, Running Man...good point..how must those boys feel?
Thanks for your comments Lady Lee
-
21
Unbelievable abuse case in Canada!
by morrisamb inhere's today's story and below the column i wrote in response
caged boys say abusers' penalty too light
kevin connor, special to the london free press and news services july 6/04
-
morrisamb
I was talking to a guy last night about the story..he goes, what good would putting them in jail for longer do? [Dah!] They'd just come out bitter, he says.
Lordy, some people don't get it.
Why do people do these things? Because they can. Not necessarily because they couldn't help themselves. Why do people believe so many abusers become born again just before judgement day? They know a lot more about choices then people give them credit for!
PS. Thanks Talespin for your comments...really appreciate it!
-
21
Unbelievable abuse case in Canada!
by morrisamb inhere's today's story and below the column i wrote in response
caged boys say abusers' penalty too light
kevin connor, special to the london free press and news services july 6/04
-
morrisamb
Here's today's story and below the column I wrote in response
Caged boys say abusers' penalty too light
KEVIN CONNOR, Special to The London Free Press and news services July 6/04
OSHAWA -- Two brothers at the heart of one of the worst child-abuse cases in Canadian history were visibly upset yesterday when their parents received nine-month jail sentences after torturing them for 13 years. "I don't feel (justice) has been served," said one boy, now 17, as he stood shoulder to shoulder with his 18-year-old brother. "I feel they should get more time."
The older boy agreed. "The justice system sucks," he said.
The Port Perry-area brothers, who were adopted at ages three and five in 1988 by their mother's sister and her husband, were forced to wear diapers into their teens, slept in dog cages, were beaten and locked in cribs.
They lived in such fear that they ate their own feces to hide evidence of accidents and, deprived of water, felt compelled to drink their own urine, court was told.
The teens -- who now live in different foster homes -- were happy to see each other and hugged in the Oshawa court before the sentencing.
It has been three years since the teens -- neither of whom can be identified -- were rescued from their home in a case that horrified police and child-care workers, who found them after a tip from a relative.
Both brothers still appear terrified of their abusers. Neither one was able to look at the couple who adopted them.
The boys' adoptive mother, 43, and father, 51, had pleaded guilty to charges of assault with a weapon, forcible confinement and failure to provide the necessaries of life.
Ontario Court Judge Donald Halikowski blasted the couple's "ill-informed system of discipline" as demeaning and damaging to the boys.
But Halikowski said their behaviour was "underscored by good intentions" and there was no evidence the parents were sadistic.
Rather, the judge said, they were out of their depth when it came to handling boys. The defence said the boys suffered from fetal alcohol syndrome and attention deficit disorder, diagnoses disputed by the Crown.
"There is no doubt they were difficult to raise," said Halikowski, though he added their treatment of the boys was beyond comprehension.
He sentenced the couple to nine months on each of the assault and confinement counts, and one month for the failure-to-provide charge. All the terms run concurrently. They will also be on probation for three years.
On bail since their arrest three years ago, the two didn't speak as they were handcuffed and taken into custody after sentencing.
The defence called the sentence fair and balanced and, despite the evidence, suggested the abuse was not as frequent as child-welfare officials alleged.
"To suggest, as was the theory, that this abusive conduct took place every day for 12 or 13 years was a far-fetched fantasy. That was not the reality," said lawyer Alex Sosna.
"These children were tethered, these children were abused periodically, but not systematically on a daily basis."
Disappointed Crown attorney Soula Olver, who had called for penitentiary terms of as long as eight years, refused to comment but said an appeal is being considered.
Even close relatives of the couple denounced the sentence as too light, given the judge's description of the boys' treatment as "near torture."
"What is (the judge) saying to the boys?" said their maternal grandfather. "This really bothers me. It really does."
"The punishment doesn't fit the crime," he added.
"She is my daughter and I'm having a terrible hard time accepting the sentence. I don't understand this judge"
Olver had earlier contrasted the couple's treatment of the boys with the kind and loving care they gave their biological son, their grandchildren and even neighbourhood kids.
Child-welfare workers rejected Halikowski's suggestion the discovery of the boys may have caused them more emotional damage than the abuse from their parents.
"We are disappointed," said Wanda Secord of the Durham Children's Aid Society.
"We had hoped for a stronger sentence."
Court heard earlier the couple went to Saskatchewan in the late 1980s to adopt her sister's children because she was dying of substance abuse and couldn't care for them.
The younger brother has denounced his adoptive mother and said he didn't have a childhood "because of her stupidness."
The older boy has said the "unbearable" crib incidents continue to haunt him.
_________
By Donald D'Haene
The more things change the more they stay the same (Caged boys say abusers penalty too light, July 6).
While Judge Donald Halikowski blasted the abusing couple's "ill-informed system of discipline" as demeaning and damaging to the boys, he also said their behaviour was "underscored by good intentions" and there was no evidence the parents were sadistic.
This sounds way too familiar. Even though we see disclosures of abuse on everything from CNN to the Jerry Springer Show, not enough has changed in how we perceive child abuse.
Yet, despite the pitiful sentence, I hope the boys? disclosure in court will lessen their feelings of shame. They certainly are not alone. Small comfort when the unfortunate reality is that they can now expect the blame game to begin. Everyone under the sun will have an opinion. Unkind comments will be hurled their way: ?It must have been easier for you to fight back since you were a boy.? ?You think you?re special, don?t you.? Or even the classic, ?I can?t say a bad thing about your foster parents. At least they provided bread on the table and clothes on your back.?
Much has been said about the co-conspiracy of silence. I suggest, people who treat victims shamefully ? in this case, an Ontario Court Judge ? are equally culpable. What these critics don?t seem to comprehend is that the patriarchal structure of the family home provided a safe haven for these abusers to maintain their position as master of their domain for a longer period of time without fear of disclosure. No doubt, these boys felt their abuse was normal while they themselves were not. Personal issues of shame and lack of esteem contributed to their silence. Their abusers counted on it.
Even so, in many ways, for these young men, the charging of their abusers is one small step toward control of their destiny, of truly exorcising their demons. Even though justice wasn?t delivered, the experience may work out to be a very empowering experience. They?ve learned first hand what many survivors discover to be a right of passage: the benefits of asserting oneself don't necessarily depend on happy outcomes, legal or otherwise.
Of course, the ideal situation would involve extensive therapy before even considering charging an abuser. For unless the victim has a strong and loving peer support system in place, the process can be another experience with abuse. I can only pray that these boys, if not earlier, will seek some form of counseling.
They need someone who will positively reinforce their self-worth, who will never discount their experience, and will allow them to be imperfect, angry, forgiving - whatever and whoever they are. Maybe The Court didn?t value their experience; it doesn?t mean we, their peers, won?t. Regardless, it's vital that they know where they?ve come from to appreciate where they are and where they want to be.
I only hope this case won?t silence other victims. Our collective stories and experience empower us, weaken predators, and help prevent future victims.
Silence only perpetuates abuse.
Donald D'Haene is the author of Father's Touch. A play based on his story will be produced in London, Canada, this fall.
-
18
I'm starting up a magazine! wish me luck!
by morrisamb in2004-05-28 for more info: http://www.fatherstouch.com/q_info.htm.
magazine to tap gay market.
ian gillespie, free press news columnist (column should begin with the words: somebody once told me part of a columnist's
-
morrisamb
Thanks for the well wishes!