N.drew

Joined

• started 60 topics
• posted 4,783 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by N.drew

• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  Yes!

  fodder:

  something fed to domestic animals; especially : coarse food for cattle, horses, or sheep.
• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  I choose "(your) free to not answer". I think that's what I was doing. I should not have asked for a good reason. I assumed you ask believers what they believe so that you might have fodder to ridicule. My bad! If you can prove the question is a legitimate one, I would be happy to answer. I do not think it is legit. I think you do not have a good reason for asking. That is what I was asking you to prove. I'm sorry.
• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  Why not start a serious thread on Bible canon and hope I show up?
• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  The last person I saw being so evasive was a JW.

  The last time I saw someone so bossy was the last time I met with the elders. I'm not being mean, it's true.
• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  Asking and generating is not the same.

  Please read all MY WORDS IF YOU WISH TO RESPOND. fAT FINGERS. Is it too much to ask? To me it is not.

  I will answer the question if you give me a good reason to. Saying that stillthinking deserves an answer because she thinks I called her a liar is hardly even a bad reason.
• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  It looks like your tripod is so badly twisted you don't know that if something said is not true, it's a lie.

  Also still thinking keeps saying I called her A LIAR. To say what you said is a lie is not the same as "calling you a liar". And since calling someone a liar is slander she keeps posting to the good readers on JWN that I am a slanderer. I think I am not a slanderer.

  I won't answer any questions generated BY HER and she knows it.
• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  Oh go on! You know you want to.

  Right and wrong. I will only highjack to MY satisfaction. I think I won't highjack for HER satistifaction. Call me selfish if you will. OH! Nevermind you already did.
• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  Your not playing fair. If you give me a good reason why I should answer YOUR question, I will. I promise.

  The other part I can't say.
• 
  111

  Questions for Thinkers, Part Deux

  by SweetBabyCheezits in

  1. social
  2. humour

  i am blatantly plagiarizing this from a 20th century email that claimed this was an open letter to laura schlessinger.

  snopes has the real scoop on it's origins.

  i'm sure it's been posted on jwn more than once in years past.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  So are these ALL scripture N.drew ?

  No can do! I think it is satire, not philosophy. I cannot highjack the thread. My hands are tied. Ask someone else.
• 
  10

  Anybody else noticed this?

  by Godsendconspirator in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  1 john 4:8 ~ "...god is love.

  " self explanitory.. 1 corinthians 13:4 ~ "...love is not jealous..." so since god is love, that would mean he is not jealous as well, right?....

  exodus 34:14 ~ "because jehovah, whose name is jealous, he is a jealous god".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  N.drew

  That's right MC RubberMallet.

  God is jealous for God's will be done which is all humankind saved and enlightened.

  I understand that is the ONLY thing God is jealous for.