I didn't find any of your comments to be reassuring.
I am afraid I don't need to reassure anyone. The facts have been presented as they are. People make their own assumptions. The source is reliable. But you actually wouldn't need any source if you'd pay attention to Lloyd's behaviour and pattern over the the course of a decade which is easily spottable and recognisable without the need of any source. As you can see around also from your argument which is totally respectable, whatever sources and evidence is presented there will always be someone who would claim it is false or fabricated.