But I am still of the opinion that a person would actually bring this on themselves down to false interpretation of the religion they follow.Can you please explain the true interpretation? You could clear up a great deal of fuss, all over the globe, if you know.
There are no "False" interpretations unless you have reason to believe there is a set objective message to that bibliography of conflicting religious texts?
Can you elaborate the "True" interpretation? If not you can't call others' interpretations "False".