My favorite was page 311 in the old green NWT, Judges 19-20:
"Mass sex crime in Gibeah. All Israel aroused."
passing time at the snorefests was a bit easier when you could find something to distract yourself.
the following are some of the headers that i found amusing while killing time as a kid
john beheaded----5000 fed
My favorite was page 311 in the old green NWT, Judges 19-20:
"Mass sex crime in Gibeah. All Israel aroused."
.
my question to this forum, is this: why have the owners of this website made it so difficult to sign in with little joined up letters, so hard to read and interprete, or is it just me?
the billionaire .
Nope, it's not just you. I have a lot of trouble reading the captchas. Sometimes I'm certain I have it and still can't get in. I'm not sure if it's some defect in the system or that I really am getting them wrong over and over again. Checking "save info" doesn't help; I still get confronted with the dreaded login page at times.
wtbts was an ngo w/ un, what about the other harlots?
i was driving down the road today and was running the scenarios of jw folklore and how it is wrong, wrong, wrong!.
for some reason i drift over to the un wtbts ngo ( i know right?
There is nothing intrinsically or biblically wrong with a religious organization being an NGO affiliate with the UN. The problem is that the WTS teaches that the UN is the "image of the wild beast" and is of Satan, then nonetheless decided to become affiliated with it for its own selfish reasons. None of the other religious organizations you listed proclaim such a teaching about the UN, therefore they are not acting hypocritically in aligning themselves with it. Only the JWs brand themselves as hypocrites by their actions.
It's as if you went around every day telling people that hamburgers are of the devil and Christians should have nothing to do with hamburgers, then one day, we found you at McDonald's scarfing down Quarter Pounders. The rest of us don't believe that there is anything wrong with eating hamburgers, so we are not acting hypocritically by eating at McDonald's - only you are, since it is your own proclaimed standard that you are violating.
it seems they can't even let you get disfellowshipped in peace !
i've been out for three years now, and i heard that i'm a whack job, i'm gay ( i'm married with a son ), that i lied on a judicial committee, and these rumors were started by my ex-fiance and her meddling congregation.
when i heard about these things i called my p.o or c.o.t.b.e ( mind you i'm disfellowshipped when i called ) .
You deserved to be slandered by people who are supposed to be Christians?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrtvycqmsey&feature=colike.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrtvycqmsey&feature=colike.
.
In Biblical terms, a prophet is one who speaks for God, one into whose mouth God has put His messages. They certainly can't say that they never claimed that.
so i was talking to my boyfriend about the whole jw scriptural divorce idea.
i made the point initally that i think when jesus was talking about reasons to get divorced, he was more or less just trying to discourage divorce for frivilous reasons.
you have to admit that there are a lot of people out there who just don't put much effort into it and just give up.
I knew after I posted it that someone would pick me up on that wording...
so i was talking to my boyfriend about the whole jw scriptural divorce idea.
i made the point initally that i think when jesus was talking about reasons to get divorced, he was more or less just trying to discourage divorce for frivilous reasons.
you have to admit that there are a lot of people out there who just don't put much effort into it and just give up.
I think that the WTS would distinguish between actual, physical adultery and adultery "in the heart." While both would be condemned as wrong, and while some types of pornography can even be grounds for disfellowshipping, I think they would contend that if no "actual" (i.e., physical) adultery had occurred, there would be no grounds for divorce.
As far as needing two witnesses for adultery, that would only apply if the person being accused denied that he/she had committed adultery. However, remember that judicial committees will accept as proof of immorality two witnesses to the fact that the accused "stayed all night in the same house with a person of the opposite sex (or a known homosexual) under improper circumstances." (Shepherd the Flock of God, p. 129, emphasis theirs). So if two elders hide in the bushes outside a woman's house and see a man to whom she is not married enter in the evening and leave in the morning, that may be all they need, even if he was just there to repair her plumbing.
i always wondered what's the point if they'll keep reinstating you.
jw version of a catholic confession?
peaceall paulnotsaul.
Seems mmore likely to me that there would be a limit on the number of times you can be reinstated. They are always more than happy to toss you out.
i like that picture a lot.
i was a bit thinner then, my hair had rather less gray in it.
it was taken when i was swimming with the dolphins on a shore excursion during a cruise in 2007. nonetheless, i look somewhat different now.
Maybe I'm technologically impaired. I've set up a Gravatar account and uploaded a few pictures, but how do I get the pictures over here?
i like that picture a lot.
i was a bit thinner then, my hair had rather less gray in it.
it was taken when i was swimming with the dolphins on a shore excursion during a cruise in 2007. nonetheless, i look somewhat different now.
I like that picture a lot. I was a bit thinner then, my hair had rather less gray in it. It was taken when I was swimming with the dolphins on a shore excursion during a cruise in 2007. Nonetheless, I look somewhat different now. I've often thought that I should replace it with something more recent, but for the life of me, I haven't been able to figure out how to change my profile picture. Can anybody give me the Complete Idiot's Guide to Changing Your Profile Picture on JWN?