filed:.
letter dated june 22, 2015, notifying the court that petitioners, watchtower and fremont congregation have reached a settlement with respondent, conti.. .
click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case..
But surely her case is about the WT changing their policies? I thought that was what Candace and Irwin Zalkin were fighting for?
Who's to say that the WT isn't going to change some policies? This settlement was just agreed to. If part of the settlement was a relaxing of the hardline "confessional" confidentiality rules, we wouldn't know yet.
And, WT probably wouldn't publicize it. It would likely be a letter to the elders.
Let's not all jump to conclusions here.
filed:.
letter dated june 22, 2015, notifying the court that petitioners, watchtower and fremont congregation have reached a settlement with respondent, conti.. .
click here to request automatic e-mail notifications about this case..
Gag order or not, settlement or not, the damage has been done.
I would venture to guess that tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) have left the organization due to the publicity this case has received. My wife is one that woke up after hearing about Candace's case...it was the straw that broke the camel's back for her.
The news stories are out there on the internet already.
The only drawback I can perceive from all of this is that if there in fact is a gag order in place, she can no longer speak out publicly about her experiences and inspire others to do the same.
jehovah's witnesses topic made it to the list:.
http://i.imgur.com/7m2xgzz.png.
Wow! JW's were above LDS? Crazy.
for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.
but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?
why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?
Isn't the whole idea or rule of "burden of proof" equally as much man-made as atheists claim the Bible is?
Why should I follow YOUR man-made rules instead of any other man-made rules?
Let's pretend for the sake of discussion that I believe in Unicorns.
Can you prove me wrong? Can you prove to me that Unicorns don't exist? Of course not! You can't prove a negative. All you can do is point out to me that there is no evidence to show that Unicorns exist.
If I were to continue to insist that they in fact do exist, wouldn't you reasonably ask me to provide evidence for my claim?
hoax, scam, bridge, talking serpents .
most assuredly this scripture was applicable: (2 thessalonians 2:1, 2) .
"however, brothers, respecting the presence of our lord jesus christ and our being gathered together to him, we request of you 2 not to be quickly shaken from your reason nor to be excited either through an inspired expression or through a verbal message or through a letter as though from us, to the effect that the day of jehovah is here.
not sure if this video has been posted before here or not, but it is a powerful scene.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx7irfn2gdi.
i haven't watched the entire movie yet, but from this scene alone, i will be..
Not sure if this video has been posted before here or not, but it is a powerful scene.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dx7irFN2gdI
I haven't watched the entire movie yet, but from this scene alone, I will be.
for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.
but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?
why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?
Fisherman: One cannot prove a negative. All that can be done is to report a lack of evidence for the positive.
Either the Bible's being divinely inspired has evidence in favor of it, or it lacks evidence.
If one's position is that it is NOT divinely inspired, they do not have to present evidence. The "evidence" of a negative is by definition a lack of evidence.
Most of us exJW's have read the Bible multiple times and looked for the evidence ourselves.
Your position, unless I am mistaken, is that the Bible is inspired of God.
If so, present the evidence in favor of that assertion.
For something as important and universally impactful as the Bible being the inspired word of God, would you not agree that the evidence must be clear and empirical?
for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.
but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?
why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?
Just because you claim that you have not seen anyone else say it, does not mean that someone else has not, does it?
Oh, so you mean to tell me, that just because someone or something claims something is true, it doesn't mean it's necessarily true? Wow!
Now, take that principle and apply it to the subject of this thread.
for many christians, the bible is viewed as the 100% error-free, perfect book straight from god, where every single word was carefully chosen by god for a reason.
but, usually, when you have a discussion on the topic, these christians will end up saying that only the original copies written directly from the hands of the prophets and apostles were error-free, and all manuscript copies since then are subject to copyist mistakes and other errors.. since zero original copies are in existence, how do we know the originals were error-free?
why should we think the originals should be error-free to begin with?
Cofty aka Vivian? And I am not the only poster on this Forum that has stated this suspicion.
Yes. Yes you are. You are the only one I've ever seen make that accusation.
the latest controversy over the confederate flag just sums up to me the state of dysfunction that exists in american society.. in summary: a white supremacist nutter shoots 9 black people dead in a church.
he's clearly inspired by the messages of others which the confederate flag is often a symbol of.. it seems like a no-brainer to remove it.
not only isn't it removed, it isn't even lowered at all as a mark of respect.. and of course now there are the people who want to defend their right to have it.
