wifibandit!
Priceless! I love it.
wifibandit!
Priceless! I love it.
so, the anti-gmo movement scored another victory today.
chipotle has opted to only use non-gmo food items.. hooray for them.
i'm pretty neutral on the subject, mostly because, other than questionable treatment of farmers, i have seen no evidence to avoid gmo's for health reasons.. basically, my neutrality boils down to the stance that i'll buy non-gmo, so long as the price is reasonable.
Do to the modification of the crops by companies like Monsanto people are finding that thier body's can no longer process the food properly and many have become allergic to them or have other reactions.
Where is the documented medical proof that GMO's are the cause?
I have a friend that if she eats any GMO food has a serious reactions and becomes very ill.
That's a case of the placebo effect. Some will read a bunch of scary stuff on GMO's, then feel ill when they eat them.
So whatever your opinion remember there are people that are getting sick because of this.
Again, where is the documented medical proof that these are the cause?
Let me put it another way:
Due to the world conditions getting worse, many people are finding that they have a deep seated concerns as to their spiritual well being. I have a friend with cancer, that when she prayed to God, her tumors shrank she she was cured. So, whatever your opinion on prayer and God is, remember there are people that could be cured because of this.
Does the above sound like rational, evidence based reasoning to you?
so, the anti-gmo movement scored another victory today.
chipotle has opted to only use non-gmo food items.. hooray for them.
i'm pretty neutral on the subject, mostly because, other than questionable treatment of farmers, i have seen no evidence to avoid gmo's for health reasons.. basically, my neutrality boils down to the stance that i'll buy non-gmo, so long as the price is reasonable.
Since there is no evidence that GMO's are harmful, labeling should be the other way around.
It's more logical for a company that wants to appeal to consumers like 20years_to_get_free to label their products non-GMO than to force all food that has GMO's to have the label.
You don't see Celiac's folks demanding that foods be labeled to indicate they contain Gluten. No, they go to the store and buy foods that they either already know are gluten free, or they are labeled Gluten Free.
And there is hard evidence that people that suffer from gluten sensitivity and Celiac's disease are adversely effected by Gluten.
No such similar evidence exists on the adverse effects of GMOs.
That's why it's far more reasonable for foods that are nonGMO to label themselves as such.
so, the anti-gmo movement scored another victory today.
chipotle has opted to only use non-gmo food items.. hooray for them.
i'm pretty neutral on the subject, mostly because, other than questionable treatment of farmers, i have seen no evidence to avoid gmo's for health reasons.. basically, my neutrality boils down to the stance that i'll buy non-gmo, so long as the price is reasonable.
So, the anti-GMO movement scored another victory today. Chipotle has opted to only use non-GMO food items.
Hooray for them.
I'm pretty neutral on the subject, mostly because, other than questionable treatment of farmers, I have seen no evidence to avoid GMO's for health reasons.
Basically, my neutrality boils down to the stance that I'll buy non-GMO, so long as the price is reasonable.
So, back to the question, what is your stance on GMO's and why is that your stance, and what evidence to you have to back up that stance?
left to right: lady gaga, liberace, geoffrey jackson.
.
Is this not Sanderson, the one that has in his wardrobe also the philippine see-through Barong? but don't worry about the cute wardrobe, it is the ugly skeleton in the closet.
LOL yes. You're right, it's Sanderson. I get those two mixed up all the time.
FYI for those who don't know what a Furry is.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furry_fandom
by the way. This is a real photo. It's not photoshopped.
Who knew?
hey guys n gals, sorry its been such a long time since i've posted.
lately i've been very busy balancing between my school work and cult activities.
since i've been doing pretty well "spiritually"(enough field-circus hours, attending meetings, underlining my literatrash, reading, praying and serving as the mic-master) my coordinator grabbed me to the side after a meeting and talked to me for twenty minutes straight congratulating me about how good i am doing.. then he paused for a good five seconds and got all serious.. then he proceeded to tell me that the young ones in the hall aren't doing too well.
What a coward!
Says the keyboard warrior hiding behind an anonymous username.
So he is doing all that so his momma doesn't throw him out on the street with nothing but $142 in his pocket?
Have you ever heard of empathy?
And you all think he is so amazing!??
Apparently the elders do too.
He should grow some balls and be true to himself!
Being true to oneself takes time. If it is a simple matter, an overnight kind of thing, for someone to be true to oneself, that must mean there's not much to that vacuous personality. They likely have certain traits such as calling random people on the Internet cowards and telling them to grow some balls.
(Obviously his momma won't throw him out if he is still at school).
It has happened before.
He is just an attention seeking idiot who needs to grow up.
I'll let the irony of that statement sink in. You have just written a post calling someone you don't know a coward, calling his manhood into question, etc. Who is the attention seeking idiot who needs to grow up again?