Adjusted knowledge: but carbon 14 dating can't be trusted with dates before the flood because the expanse would have shielded radiation. (Actual response someone gave me when I was discussing carbon 14 dating with them. )
cappytan
JoinedPosts by cappytan
-
11
Creationist Discovers 60 million Year Old Fish Fossils - Insists that they date to Noah's Flood 4500 years ago
by OrphanCrow init is astounding that someone like this creationist can have no appreciation for the scientific significance of his discovery.
even in the face of evidence to the contrary, those who chose to believe rather than know will never forsake their ignorance.. alberta creationist discovers rare fish fossils in basement dig (full article and video).
"an alberta man who discovered a school of rare fossilized fish while digging up a calgary basement believes the world was created by god a few thousand years ago.. it's for that reason edgar nernberg doesn't think the fossils could possibly be as old as paleontologists are estimating.. "i subscribe to the creationist position, and i believe they were laid down in noah's flood, about 4,500 years ago.
-
-
-
9
Do you impose your views on others?
by wifibandit inthe irony!
when i first saw this picture i thought they were holding the bible teach book!
ha!
-
-
cappytan
Wifi pointed out that the Bible Teach book has an updated cover. So in the interests of tracing all things with accuracy...
-
76
By “evolution,” we mean “macroevolution”—apes turning into humans, for example.
by FadingTruth inaugust 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
-
-
cappytan
Everyone needs to light up Dawkins on Twitter NOW. If he sees that's I think they'll have made an enemy who tirelessly destroys them. I tweeted him also.
They will just silently change the online article to appease the sh!tstorm.
-
164
California Supreme Court Case - S226656
by Gayle inhttp://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/maincasescreen.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2109889&doc_no=s226656&search=party&start=1&query_partylastnameororg=watchtower bible and tract.
started 5/27/2015.
-
-
cappytan
What makes you think that church elders don't do that. Everyone has children that go to church. But no one is perfect and sometimes imperfect church elders screw up. Wake up call for parents. Do not trust anyone with your precious little ones. They depend on you for protection. Trust no one.
Obvious apologist is obvious. Brother Lett, is that you?
You still didn't answer the question that I asked.
What's worse? Breaking confidentiality or endangering children?
-
164
California Supreme Court Case - S226656
by Gayle inhttp://appellatecases.courtinfo.ca.gov/search/case/maincasescreen.cfm?dist=0&doc_id=2109889&doc_no=s226656&search=party&start=1&query_partylastnameororg=watchtower bible and tract.
started 5/27/2015.
-
-
cappytan
James 4:17 - "if someone knows how to do what is right and yet does not do it, it is a sin for him."
The right thing to do is to protect children. Who cares if it's a "legal" obligation or not. It's the RIGHT THING TO DO.
What's worse? Breaking confidentiality or endangering children? Because those ARE the choices.
-
9
Do you impose your views on others?
by wifibandit inthe irony!
when i first saw this picture i thought they were holding the bible teach book!
ha!
-
-
cappytan
Hmmmmmm
-
76
By “evolution,” we mean “macroevolution”—apes turning into humans, for example.
by FadingTruth inaugust 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
-
-
cappytan
James Brown: That picture is still consistent with the modern day theory of evolution. Each step on that scale is a slice of time over millions of years. -
76
By “evolution,” we mean “macroevolution”—apes turning into humans, for example.
by FadingTruth inaugust 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
-
-
cappytan
I can't believe they f*cking quoted RICHARD EFFING DAWKINS in this article!
The “words” and “sentences” in DNA make up the various “recipes” that direct the production of proteins and other substances that form the building blocks of the various cells that make up the body. For example, the “recipe” might guide the production of bone cells, muscle cells, nerve cells, or skin cells. “The filament of DNA is information, a message written in a code of chemicals, one chemical for each letter,” wrote evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins. “It is almost too good to be true, but the code turns out to be written in a way that we can understand.”
WHAT THE HELL? They're quoting him to support their lie that complexity means a creator!
-
6
"Macroevolution" - where did the term come from? (Calling Coftey, et. al.)
by cappytan inis macroevolution a word made up by evolutionary scientists and darwinists, or did creationists come up with that word?.
because, from my understanding, there is no such thing as macroevolution.
an ape didn't give birth to a human, for instance.
-
-
cappytan
Is Macroevolution a word made up by evolutionary scientists and darwinists, or did creationists come up with that word?
Because, from my understanding, there is no such thing as Macroevolution. An ape didn't give birth to a human, for instance. It was all gradual and microevolution.
-
76
By “evolution,” we mean “macroevolution”—apes turning into humans, for example.
by FadingTruth inaugust 2015 awake .
quote in title taken from article footnote.. anyone have information on who gene hwang and yan-der hsuuw in the article are?.
why do they repeatedly state that apes turned to humans when that's not what evolutionists teach at all?.
-
-
cappytan
From that same article:
Is Evolution a Scientific Theory?
What qualifies a theory as a scientific theory? According to theEncyclopedia of Scientific Principles, Laws, and Theories, a scientific theory, such as Albert Einstein’s theory of gravity, must
Be observable
Be reproducible by controlled experiments
Make accurate predictions
In that light, where does evolution stand? * Its operation cannot be observed. It cannot be reproduced. And it cannot make accurate predictions. Can evolution even be considered a scientific hypothesis? The same encyclopedia defines a hypothesis as “a more tentative observation of facts [than a theory],” yet lends itself “to deductions that can be experimentally tested.”
Wow... Look at that last paragraph.
"Its operation cannot be observed." Wrong, the fossil record shows how it operates.
"It cannot be reproduced." Well, neither can gravity. We haven't been able to make artificial gravity, yet it's still scientifically sound and accurate.
"It cannot make accurate predictions." Well, yeah, because evolution isn't a person that predicts things. However, scientists can accurately predict how things will evolve depending on the environment you subject them to. For instance, if Kevin Costner's Waterworld were to actually happen, Humans might eventually evolve into several different species of whale-like mammals, although not exactly like whales.
