some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
$$$Please, be merciful everyone. Don't feed the village idiot's mind.$$$
Brought to you by . . . the village idiot. Cause it take one to know one.
And who is the real idiot in this place? the one talking in circles or the ones replying to the one talking in circles?
Hmmm
some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
$$$Obviously YOU didn't, non. I said you cannot DISPROVE a negative.$$$
Sorry non was not listening.
Besides, non never asked you to disprove a negative. He asked you to prove that a statement was false when what he really meant was for you to prove a statement true. Either way, non did not ask you to disprove a negative.
some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
Dear stinky
$$$Is the WTBS a false prophet? If not, I'd like to know which of their prophecies came true. I can name at least 10 that were false which to me equals a false prophet.$$$
Non has answered this so many times he don't feel like wastin' his time. Read Greg Stafford's book JWD2 and it would save both of us gobbles of time and bytes.
And non does not believe that the wt is a false prophet. You happy now?
And non is not confused about free speech being a natural right. Ajax is though.
some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
$$$Just because freedom of speech is not practiced(in Iraq) does not mean it is not a natural right.$$$
True enough. But non's comments must be read in the context of his dialogue with ajax. Ajax thinks that free speech is a natural right just because one opens her motuh and speaks. Non so.
some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
Dear ajax
Let non spell it out for you because you do not seem to get it.
$$$It is not a political one. You know it, but you're denying it.$$$
Non does not know if free speech is a natural right or not. But he does know that it is a political one. We are talking about rights and not abilities. Do you see what non is saying? Geez, it is not that hard to understand.
$$$Can you speak?
Can you talk?$$$
Yes.
$$$If your answer is yes, then freedom of speech is natural.$$$
No it is not. Not when you are talking about rights. Regardless of whether I could talk in Iraq, would you still say that free speech exists there? Do you get it yet?
some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
$$$Can you prove it is not natural and God-given?$$$
Did you not listen to Farkel? You cannot prove a negative.
$$$If it is political, it is because people try to suppress it therefore, it is natural.$$$
What? It is political because the government gives you the right to express yourself. If the government does not allow you to speak freely, then you do not have free speech.
$$$freedom of speech is natural otherwise, I cannot express anything that comes to my mind.$$$
You still have not proved that freeness of speech is a natural RIGHT. Now do you get it, yo?
$$$You cannot prove it too.$$$
What you saying? Non is not the one arguing that free speech is a natural right. We both know it is a political one.
$$$Non, I would really like to know what you think about my post, I'm curious.$$$
Your post reeks like your name. Do you guys have large database with all that regurgitated yak on it?
some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
$$$
It is not necessarily a natural or God-given right.
How do you know that? OR Is that your opinion?$$$
We both know that freedom of speech is a political right in the US. That fact can be empirically verified. It is also an experiential fact.
But can you prove that free speech is a natural right? No you can't. What would be the basis for saying that freedom of speech is a natural right? Would you say God? But would that not beg the question for those who are atheists? Why do you think and how would you prove that free speech is a natural right without being circular?
Dear craw
Are you following me? Non is already taken, dear.
some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
$$$Back to the subject of Freedom of Speech, Can't we, non-JWs, have a right to that? or Is it that only you and only JWs have a right to that freedom?$$$
In certain countries, every citizen supposedly has a right to free speech. Freedom of speech is a political right. It is not necessarily a natural or God-given right.
In those countries that have free speech, you and jws have a right to free speech. Use your free speech. But just remember that everybody will render an account to God for how they chose to use their free speech.
some people in this place think that jws break up families.
they say that since jws df unrepentant baptized members and insist on jw family members restricting association with df members that jws try to break up families.
what do you think about this charge?.
$$$Really? How do you know deddaisy has no idea what she is saying?$$$
It was non's opinion. But it is one he thinks is correct. Okay, living forever may not be desirable as a bare happening. But what about living forever in a paradise earth with no death or problems or crime?
Non loves life and thinks that life is a most precious gift of God. The thought of being snuffed out forever is one of the worse things non can imagine. And by "snuffed out" non does not mean being destroyed forever. He means being without life.
Which would non rather have? The life he would like to have now or living forever in paradise. There is no comparison. Gimme eternal life in paradise.
jesus christ said these telling words.
and he supplemented them by also saying that his followers would be persecuted as he was persecuted.
jesus's disciples were persecuted in the first century by a bitter wave of roman persecution.
Farkel
"Woe, whenever all men speak well of you, for things like these are what their forefathers did to the false prophets" (Luke 6:26)
