Viv, you’re attempting to apply scientific method [principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses, according to Webster] on the following:
history
1: tale, story
2
a : a chronological record of significant events (as affecting a nation or institution) often including an explanation of their causes
b : a treatise presenting systematically related natural phenomena
c : an account of a patient’s medical background
d : an established record
3: a branch of knowledge that records and explains past events
4
a : events that form the subject matter of a history
b : events of the past
c : one that is finished or done for (Webster).
As you can see from above definitions, you’re definitely going to encounter problems by doing that. And “cutting off” could be applied to Christ’s death. For those that are interested in an explanation:
As Feinberg has ably demonstrated, the Hebrew term for “cut off in verse 26 is an appropriate reference to Christ’s sacrificial death on the cross. “The ‘cutting off’ of Messiah indicates a violent death. The Hebrew word is used of making a covenant, involving the death of a sacrificial animal (Gen 15:10 , 18 ). The word is used of the death penalty ( Lev 7:20 ) and always of an unnatural violent death (cf. Isa 53:8 ).”
Vol. 166: Bibliotheca Sacra. 2009 (663) (334). Dallas , TX : Dallas Theological Seminary.
Feinberg, “An Exegetical and Theological Study of Daniel 9:24-27 ,” 202.