As a person we have our own personal preferences. You, as a doctor, make life or death decisions every day. In war or a pandemic, you'll have to apply triage rules. But in the end one cannot equate God with anyone on earth, it's like comparing apples to pears. We are limited in what we create. We have a certain measure of control in what we create. If I understand it correctly, there is no limitations placed on God. On the other hand, as Creator he can place rules and limitations on us. It is his right.
Posts by Vidqun
-
16Even if God exists…….
by snare&racket ini’m an atheist.. let’s assume i am wrong, i am willing to be.. let’s give people a god, let’s even make him the god of the bible…... does he deserve to be worshipped and obeyed?
if so, why does his abhorrent actions not morally make you question allegiance to him?.
does his authority alone allow him to murder and drown and order war, to throw people into a lake of fire?.
-
-
-
16
Even if God exists…….
by snare&racket ini’m an atheist.. let’s assume i am wrong, i am willing to be.. let’s give people a god, let’s even make him the god of the bible…... does he deserve to be worshipped and obeyed?
if so, why does his abhorrent actions not morally make you question allegiance to him?.
does his authority alone allow him to murder and drown and order war, to throw people into a lake of fire?.
-
-
Vidqun
Rules for the Creator and for us are different. He created everything and everything belongs to him. We are organisms in a petri dish. The scientist use, discard or experiment to his heart's content. Then he gets rid of it. Similar to pest control, one gets rid of an invasion of cockroaches without moral qualms. And out rules and laws differ vastly from rules and laws of a thousand years ago. Today civilization allows for a Woke and Cancel culture. We want God to be ethical and moral according to our standards. Remember, we are in a petri dish.
-
86
Is most of the promotion of creationism, not just that by the WT, charlatanism?
by Disillusioned JW inis most of the promotion of creationism, not just that by the wt, charlatanism?.
https://www.fullmoon.nu/sources.bak/chapter%2010/part%202/gish%20exposed.html [which has an article called "creationism: bad science or immoral pseudoscience?
- (an expose of creationist dr. duane gish)"] says the following.. 'a look at the "scientific" creationist movement and a close examination of the tactics of a well-known and influential creationist will reveal that the creation "science" movement gains much of its strength through the use of distortion and scientifically unethical tactics.. .... with the facts explained and the lawsuits won, scientists declared victory and returned to their labs and offices.
-
-
Vidqun
Even if scientists succeed in creating life, not DNA or RNA, but a living cell able to procreate in a "primordial soup" in a lab, I will still not believe. The problem is with the words "creating" and "in a lab."
Abiogenesis is an impossibility. From there for the primitive cell to develop and diversify into complicated cells, structures and sexes by means of "beneficial" mutations is a second impossibility as the video demonstrated. If you teach your kids this, you are teaching them a fallacy and a lie. You are indeed stunting their development. Whatever the origin of life is, abiogenesis and evolution it is not.
-
86
Is most of the promotion of creationism, not just that by the WT, charlatanism?
by Disillusioned JW inis most of the promotion of creationism, not just that by the wt, charlatanism?.
https://www.fullmoon.nu/sources.bak/chapter%2010/part%202/gish%20exposed.html [which has an article called "creationism: bad science or immoral pseudoscience?
- (an expose of creationist dr. duane gish)"] says the following.. 'a look at the "scientific" creationist movement and a close examination of the tactics of a well-known and influential creationist will reveal that the creation "science" movement gains much of its strength through the use of distortion and scientifically unethical tactics.. .... with the facts explained and the lawsuits won, scientists declared victory and returned to their labs and offices.
-
-
Vidqun
Anony Mous, you've said it. It has been CREATED in a lab. That explains it all.
-
86
Is most of the promotion of creationism, not just that by the WT, charlatanism?
by Disillusioned JW inis most of the promotion of creationism, not just that by the wt, charlatanism?.
https://www.fullmoon.nu/sources.bak/chapter%2010/part%202/gish%20exposed.html [which has an article called "creationism: bad science or immoral pseudoscience?
- (an expose of creationist dr. duane gish)"] says the following.. 'a look at the "scientific" creationist movement and a close examination of the tactics of a well-known and influential creationist will reveal that the creation "science" movement gains much of its strength through the use of distortion and scientifically unethical tactics.. .... with the facts explained and the lawsuits won, scientists declared victory and returned to their labs and offices.
-
-
Vidqun
Information system: computer > quantum computer > advanced programming vs. cell nucleus > DNA/RNA > information system + manufacturing system (preprogrammed). The computer needs a designer, manufacturer and programmer. Yet the cell and its programming and manufacturing system have as yet not been duplicated from scratch. It is impossible for an information system to develop on its own. It needs a designer, manufacturer and programmer.
-
34
Pfizer becomes first Covid vaccine to gain full FDA approval
by PaddyTheBaddy ingreat news.. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-58309254.
pfizer's two-dose covid-19 vaccine has received full approval from the us food and drug administration (fda) - the first jab to be licensed in the nation.. .
the vaccine had initially been given emergency use authorisation.
-
-
Vidqun
Data-Dog, if you had Covid, you have natural immunity, and here's some good news for a change:
The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a “Don’t try this at home” label. The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.
This time, the data leave little doubt that natural infection truly is the better option for protection against the delta variant, despite the fact that the US won't acknowledge the already infected as having antibodies protecting them from the virus.
As the first country to achieve widepsread coverage by the vaccine, Israel is now in an unthinkable situation: daily case numbers have reached new record levels as the delta variant penetrates the vaccines' protection like a hot knife slicing through butter.
-
-
-
Vidqun
Last week President Joe Biden told the coronavirus vaccines propaganda whopper that about 350 million Americans had taken shots of the experimental coronavirus vaccines. That number, of course, is greater than the United States population.
Not content to leave the extreme overcounting of supposed vaccination success to her boss, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki, in a Wednesday press briefing, claimed that we have “seen tens of millions of people’s lives saved who have gotten the vaccine; that data is clear across the country.”
Wonder where they get their data from? County of San Diego perhaps? If you believe that you believe anything.
-
-
-
Vidqun
Joey jojo, some repetition for emphasis. Do take a look at Israel and Iceland. Current figures. Israel's dire situation was discussed on the BBC just now. The logic behind the problem is simple. Bringing out a vaccine in the middle of an epidemic causes the vaccine-resistant viruses to flourish, not rocket science at all. But do carry on following people like Dr. Fauci, who are heavily invested in vaccines. They have your interests at heart. It has nothing to do with the stockmarket.
-
-
-
Vidqun
Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill.
Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.
PaddyTheBaddy, I like these numbers more. Prevention is better than cure. If you want to take your chance with an experimental vaccine, with unknown, long-term consequences and side-effects, that's your choice. I believe in free choice.
-
-
-
Vidqun
Boomer, the Gibraltar stats may not look convincing because of their low population figures. I looked at Google Iceland and Israel stats. These demonstrate the problem. They have a serious surge while the majority of their population has been vaccinated. The Israelis are contemplating a third jab.
