Craig,
quoting quotes would complicate or strech the issue much longer than desired; my head is spining at this late hour..
generally speaking humans are not happy with what other humans have been doing for a long time, specially what those with power do. Please dont ask me to define hapiness, i am traying to prevent phylosophical and semantic argumentation.
Simply speaking, if the majority is not happy..
then what has been done is BAD generally speaking. That is what i call empiric results.
So due to the humans intrinsic state of mind, the net result of human activity is not satisfactory, unhapiness.
Based in such reality, no satisfaction unhapiness, is why the WT and other religions have survived.
You state that "and the db environment is a difficult place to exchange thoughts",
i cant think of a better way, at least to clarify without interruption, all deep court cases are resolved in writting, ask the supreme court. Laws have a section to define all terms utilized, preventing individual interpretations. All good judges denife the issues before judgment. .
In this topic defining the issue and the terminology (such as intrinsic) was/is neccesary, it was not done in this case and the majority of the topics.
Lastly i did not see a response to a simple argumet stated by Perry, (in plain english would be best).