cofty truth is based on a frame of reference. Tell me are there more natual numbers(1,2,3,4 ...) between 0 and postive infinity than real values(0, 0.1, 0.11 ...) from 0 to 1? Did you know that there are the same number of real values between 0 to 1 than 0 to postive infinity. Wait what? count([0, infinity)) = count([0,1]) for all real values. Thats nonsense because [0,1] should be a subset of [0, infinity). I believe the first one to discover this was going crazy. Makes no sence that they are equal numbers between 0-1 as 0-2 or 0-infinity.
Now depending how you define your math the above is true or not. The way we define it is true, yet if we were to make different rules then it might be true it might not.
We been trained to think a certain way. Most discoveries happen because of an accidents or because someone was thinking completely outside our education system.
I am not saying we shouldn't be emphatic about anything(we all need O2 etc.). But sometimes (I feel might be wrong) that we tend to be emphatic just to prove our point even though there is not enough evidence to guarntee we are 100% right.
And I am not against any debate it might be only the few threads I have read but I get the impression asseartions are made that are not 100% accurate as if they were and sometimes people are put down because they don't agree with others.