wobble - point taken. And I do sometimes ask that basic question as to whether the Bible canon is the exact sum of what God inspired and wanted us to accept. Is there some truth in the apocryphal books, and are some of the established ones questionable. At present I accept that God is capable of preserving His word as he wanted it, despite who established the canon. But I am open to revision on that one if persuasive evidence is presented ot the contrary.
elderelite - agreed about the preaching. But there is a responsibility for individual Christians to teach and make disciples, so this criterion would have to be met in some way even if not the exact way JWs do it.
phizzy - word of God (see comments above for caveat though)
punkofnice -
Rutherford / Hitler. Agreed there was a measure of appeasement going on. I'm not convinced the intentions were all bad under the circumstances though. Don't get me wrong I'm not a huge Rutherford fan, but I keep an open mind and I can see that he was trying to make life easier for the witnesses at the time. Maybe he misjudged the best way to do that. I don't know. I've never heard anything about JW snitches. If you have references please could you post them. Even then I would have to take the general position as the measure, rather than a small number of isolated cases. But I would like to see it. Blood issue - agreed. It's inconsistent and probably fundamentally wrong. Disfellowshipping - possibly a correct principal badly applied. I don't agree with "anything goes" in the congregation though, I think there has to be some measures in extreme cases and I believe the precedent for that exists in scripture. Share in millitary interests? I'd have to see the evidence. Anyone who has share portfolios might have some money in the wrong place, but I'd be interested to see if there is evidence that such investments have been willfully made.
Preaching unproductive? Maybe, but I have seen people get baptized as a result of door to door. Jesus didn't say how productive the work would be, so I don't think the productivity is a measure of whether it's right or not. The message - agreed - it's not exactly right in all cases, but for those who have no Bible knowledge I think it's still better than nothing.
"If my house was on fire?" - that would be true if correct. Let's just say in my case there is a problem with the drains. If I could relocate to somewhere without the problem I would give it proper consideration, but I'm not yet convinced that leaving the house is the best option.
Lily Pie - nice thoughts. Thanks.
N.Drew - that's a different way to think about Heb 10:25. I'll have to give that some thought.
wasblind - Yes. We should be witnesses of Jesus. I note that WTS must have noted this valid criticism, as there was a WT study to encourage this a few months back. But I agree with your point. The message isn't always quite right.