original reddit post (removed).
Okay. before this turns into a flame war let's give a person the benefit of the doubt. As I said, we can all change.
I agree with Thisismein1972. We have all made mistakes and then changed our minds later on. Just because DE KEK was pro Lloyd in the beginning does not give us the right to judge him now.
Also let's not lose focus on what this thread is about, James Lloyd Evans.
original reddit post (removed).
A lot has happened since then and people are now seeing Lloyd for who he is.
This is what happened to me. It took me quite a few months to decide how I felt about the situation.
original reddit post (removed).
Here he is Pr0ner I've found about it. It seemed to have happened in 2017. Very bizarre I've never heard anything like it!! He must have made very specific personal allegations. I've got to say this particular video is very restrained and I certainly can't see any problem with it at all. I'm really shocked. There's got to be more to it. He's not an exjw but he is a Christian it seems.
Its funny but this just came to mind. It is sort of like the roles are reversed now. In essence someone is coming up to the JW's door (cart) unannounced and uninvited trying to question them on what they believe. They (JW's) act just the way most of the people did when we were knocking on doors. Got to love that karma!
original reddit post (removed).
Given the recent absurd video made by some woman with a fake voice claiming her Bethelite cousin told her Lloyd was an undercover Watchtower mole
Can you please provide the link to this video you mention? I would love to see that one!
original reddit post (removed).
Newsflash: if you make money by making yourself a public figure, you don't get to complain about being a public figure!
I thought that as well Simon. I was thoroughly shocked that she won this case. It does lend some credence to some of the JW's he is recording suing over it doesn't it? Or is this a case of a celebrity getting a different law outcome because of celebrity status?
original reddit post (removed).
I just found a case that says that the "expectation of privacy" can apply in certain circumstances for pictures being released to the public. I would assume this would apply to videos as well.
This case though is of a celebrity (Naomi Campbell) having her picture taken of her coming out of a NA meeting in England. She sued the "Mirror" newspaper for publishing the story and picture.
10. In the proceedings Miss Campbell claimed damages for breach of confidence and compensation under the Data Protection Act 1998. The article of 7 February formed the main basis of a claim for aggravated damages. Morland J [2002] EWHC 499 (QB) upheld Miss Campbell's claim. He made her a modest award of £2,500 plus £1,000 aggravated damages in respect of both claims. The newspaper appealed. The Court of Appeal, comprising Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers MR, Chadwick and Keene LJJ, allowed the appeal and discharged the judge's order: [2002] EWCA Civ 1373, [2003] QB 633. Miss Campbell has now appealed to your Lordships' House.
I have not read the whole opinion yet (it is massively long) but it gives the complete opinions of 5 Lords of Parliament. I will not copy and paste because it would take days to scroll through my message because it is so long, so I am just going to provide the Parliament House of Lords link to this case.
House of Lords - Campbell (Apellant) v. MGN Limited (Respondents) (parliament.uk)
original reddit post (removed).
Yes probably embarrassment has something to do with him cancelling Zoom calls.
It just came to mind there may be another reason as well. What if he is afraid one of his patrons will get some balls and ask him a hard question that he does not want to answer? Especially with so very few patrons he has left. What if he and only a few or even 1 is on there and they decide to ask him because no one else is on there? What the hell is he going to do then? Block his own cash cow? Lie? Confess? Apologize? Geez I would not want to be put in that situation at all!
original reddit post (removed).
I don’t know if LE experiences no cringe about the whole thing or he just feels he has no other options.
I think it is he has no other options right now of making money so he has to do it this way until he finds another way to make money to sustain his existence.
original reddit post (removed).
You can be certain that if valid service occurs, the M7 will be legally represented, at our own expense.
I want to help cover the cost of the expenses to represent you guys. I would find it insulting to me if I was not able to help with that! We are in this together! We may not be named on the court documents, but we are going through this together!
original reddit post (removed).
I did not sign a release therefore he does not have my consent. I asked him to remove it and he did.
I know you asked him to remove it from his YouTube channel and he did. However, by the looks of his IMDB profile he is uploading it there. Might be time for Mr. Evans to receive a cease-and-desist letter?
