so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
On the contrary attacking anything that we currently believe to be true - and doing so with evidence - will get you nominated for a Nobel Prize.
For some. But for many, they were treated like fools, heaven forbid even shunned by their community and never got the recognition until they died.
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
Yes it did. Lots of people died of bleeding stomach ulcers without surgery.
Well there you go. My scientific doctor said the operation caused more grief than it was worth. But hey that's science. Its like opinions, just pick your favourite one or your favorite scientist or your favorite scientific interpretation.
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
No Cofty, surgery did not save lives at all. I had a good talk to my doctor later. My very scientific doctor said surgery caused considerable grief.
Surgery for this problem proved to very unscientific, actually positively stupid.
Anyway, I just mentioned this one thing because I'm familiar the story and they were Australians that discovered he bacteria.
There are many, many stories of where 'science' has failed even killed those that trusted it.
But of course we have pure science.
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
Just as religion whores its self to politics, science whores it self to the commercial world.
Ah yes but we have true science. I think I have heard something like that before.
for years i denied myself the thing i loved to do the most to be a good jw.
i love to ride off-road motorcycles.
so, i am going to indulge myself and get a new dirt bike.. i love to see god's creation from the vantage point of a motorcycle on a mountain top.
I loved motorcycles.....I mean, I use live and dream about them 24hrs a day. Dirt bikes and road bikes. Imagined I'd be a world champion. I realized in time it could never have happened because when my brother started riding he was a real natural, hugely gifted, I was not.
Still given my time over, I would certainly give racing a go. But then I might have died and never had sex.
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
Viviane...The best science of the day and accepted around the world was to cut a portion of the stomach out for stomach ulcers...fact. Until new scientific light said otherwise. New light they resisted for many years.
I'm just saying, science is as unreliable as any other human endeavor because humans are involved.
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
Not deriding it, it has valid place in life and is quite fascinating in fact. And we rely on it every day, but it has failed us big time often.
JWS talk endlessly about new light, but that would pale into insignificance compared with the amount of times science has declared new light. Eg. Once upon a time not that long ago surgeons would cut half your stomach out to cure you of stomach ulcers even 'tho it was established bacteria caused the problem but they couldn't accept that fact for many years...for a number of unscientific reasons.
anyone know whatever happened to former do paul illingworth?
he was teaching mts school for many years, but heard that he got out of the do work (before they got rid of the arrangement).
he was super intelligent and one of the "nicer" company men that i came across during my time in the borg.
Blondie ....I wish you were Australian. Angus Stewart of the Royal Commission would love you story.
I'm not going to tell my wife your story....it would make her so angry... she would love you so much.
so now that most of us have come to a semi truthful understanding that the witnesses are wrong about evolutionist, there is a certain question that i have always had.
now if you were to ask any jw, they'd recite a complete fallacy from scientist regarding this.
but what is you guys input of this.
I think the naysayers of science understand that it too is populated by humans with same strengths and failings that afflict all mankind.
Scientists are no more honest or dishonest than the general population.
