Orphan, Your point is well taken, however the line is fine.
When a religion has, as part of its religiousness, a published teaching that is damaging to the social fabric, then there is no difference in the discriminatory action taken against the religion.
One cannot separate the teaching from the religion. It’s not a matter of a ‘baby vs the bathwater’. The baby and the bathwater are inseparable. So if the bathwater is poison, then so is the baby.
When people hear the word discrimination, they immediately conjure up in their minds something negative.
Descriminarion, however, is not a negative term. Sometimes, it’s not only warranted, it’s necessary and just. See affirmative action.
Go to a US border crossing. They are quite discriminating, and the basis for their discrimination is in a constant state of flux.
The teaching concerning the turning in of one’s fellow member in the Watchtower religion is as much a part of the religion as going door to door is part. The Watchtower itself has written this in stone. So, discrimination based on a Watchtowers teaching is discrimination against religion.
But that is now warranted, and desirable.