Nothing new? Sorry, the big news is that this info is coming out. I don’t care if it’s 2 years old, just the fact that we are seeing it is momentous.
lastmanstanding
JoinedPosts by lastmanstanding
-
138
LEAKED: WHQ Accounts: 2016-2020 Budget
by Fay Dehr inleaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 1 of 5] https://youtu.be/g08tw2v3b4s.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 2 of 5] https://youtu.be/rpceb5v0vbe.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 3 of 5] https://youtu.be/2xa08ukc_6i.
-
-
138
LEAKED: WHQ Accounts: 2016-2020 Budget
by Fay Dehr inleaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 1 of 5] https://youtu.be/g08tw2v3b4s.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 2 of 5] https://youtu.be/rpceb5v0vbe.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 3 of 5] https://youtu.be/2xa08ukc_6i.
-
lastmanstanding
Money is flying out the window hard and fast. This is undeniable. The GB would never choose to cut back and cut back and cut back.
If I were the big banks, and Watchtower had borrowed gobs of money, and even if they were making good o the debt structure, I would take into account the growing number of child molestation cases and lawsuits and I would begin to foreclose on the loans.
I would want to get our bank’s money out before the shite hits the fan big time. You do not want to be on the bottom of the creditor’s list.
-
138
LEAKED: WHQ Accounts: 2016-2020 Budget
by Fay Dehr inleaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 1 of 5] https://youtu.be/g08tw2v3b4s.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 2 of 5] https://youtu.be/rpceb5v0vbe.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 3 of 5] https://youtu.be/2xa08ukc_6i.
-
lastmanstanding
In Vid 3, he says thousands of properties will be sold and this in “income”...
So, in truth, they are selling properties to pay bills.
There’s no getting around that.
-
138
LEAKED: WHQ Accounts: 2016-2020 Budget
by Fay Dehr inleaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 1 of 5] https://youtu.be/g08tw2v3b4s.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 2 of 5] https://youtu.be/rpceb5v0vbe.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 3 of 5] https://youtu.be/2xa08ukc_6i.
-
lastmanstanding
Forensic examination of the financial discussion that begins with video #2.
+ General Revenue
- Operating Expenses
[ - Payments on Bank Debts ]
= Operating
Surplus orDeficit.[ + Begging on JWTV ]
= Still a deficit
I want to highlight that during Vid 2 he said ‘Kingdom halls in must equal Kingdom Halls out’.... at the same time, he said that “properties are from time to time sold and this money goes into the WWW kitty.
You cannot have it both ways. If property is sold, ie KHs, and this money has to go to building or reno of other halls, then it cannot also go to the WWW kitty.
Can you say lie?
-
138
LEAKED: WHQ Accounts: 2016-2020 Budget
by Fay Dehr inleaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 1 of 5] https://youtu.be/g08tw2v3b4s.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 2 of 5] https://youtu.be/rpceb5v0vbe.
leaked: whq accounts: 2016-2020 budget [part 3 of 5] https://youtu.be/2xa08ukc_6i.
-
lastmanstanding
Watching these idiots with their choreographed, poorly acted BS, reading from scripts while at the same time trying to sound genuine is ridiculous.
You can see the puppet strings. But when you watch the GB, they look equally puppet. The only question in my mind, “Who is the puppeteer?”
It is quite likely that the puppet master is THE BANKS.
It is possible that the Watchtower borganization gorged on cheap credit during the early pre-Armageddon years, and now in the late pre-Armageddon to early post-Armageddon period, the banks want their money back.
Just like Ford Motor who borrowed money against every single asset they had, including the “Blue Oval”, Watchtower likely borrowed heavily against all their assets in the mistaken belief that they would never have to pay off these debts.
-
18
Religious Discrimination; now LEGAL
by lastmanstanding innewsflash.
there are businesses that are now discriminating in their hiring practices based on the fact that you are a jw.. sure, you think i'm mad.
but it's true.. the business circles have become acutely aware of the -not even 1 year old- decision in the industrial court where a jw ratted out a fellow jw and brought disrepute to the bank where they both worked.
-
lastmanstanding
Orphan, Your point is well taken, however the line is fine.
When a religion has, as part of its religiousness, a published teaching that is damaging to the social fabric, then there is no difference in the discriminatory action taken against the religion.
One cannot separate the teaching from the religion. It’s not a matter of a ‘baby vs the bathwater’. The baby and the bathwater are inseparable. So if the bathwater is poison, then so is the baby.
When people hear the word discrimination, they immediately conjure up in their minds something negative.
Descriminarion, however, is not a negative term. Sometimes, it’s not only warranted, it’s necessary and just. See affirmative action.
Go to a US border crossing. They are quite discriminating, and the basis for their discrimination is in a constant state of flux.
The teaching concerning the turning in of one’s fellow member in the Watchtower religion is as much a part of the religion as going door to door is part. The Watchtower itself has written this in stone. So, discrimination based on a Watchtowers teaching is discrimination against religion.
But that is now warranted, and desirable.
-
18
Religious Discrimination; now LEGAL
by lastmanstanding innewsflash.
there are businesses that are now discriminating in their hiring practices based on the fact that you are a jw.. sure, you think i'm mad.
but it's true.. the business circles have become acutely aware of the -not even 1 year old- decision in the industrial court where a jw ratted out a fellow jw and brought disrepute to the bank where they both worked.
-
lastmanstanding
Aclue... was your situation actionable? Can you discern how the confidential info got out?
-
18
Religious Discrimination; now LEGAL
by lastmanstanding innewsflash.
there are businesses that are now discriminating in their hiring practices based on the fact that you are a jw.. sure, you think i'm mad.
but it's true.. the business circles have become acutely aware of the -not even 1 year old- decision in the industrial court where a jw ratted out a fellow jw and brought disrepute to the bank where they both worked.
-
lastmanstanding
Nice post Barb. Im going to give you a call to tell you a very interesting story.
-
78
So What Drastic Money Change is Next?
by OnTheWayOut inokay, they cheapened the product by getting rid of hardcover books.
they reduced printing of mags.
they drastically reduced the number of pieces of printed paper that members would "place" in people's hands in various ways, the biggest one being that they put them on a cart and don't encourage people to take them.they cut d.o.
-
lastmanstanding
I have said it all along. There is a big hole in the bucket. Bigger than the one we all know about.
There is a third party involved, and they are pulling the strings. It is they who are responsible for placing 8 complete idiots in the position of authority. They are puppets.
Somebody who has the real power is dissolving the organization.
If the org needed the billion$ that it is reaping today to survive, then they would never have lasted this long in the first place.
Dark hand.
-
18
Religious Discrimination; now LEGAL
by lastmanstanding innewsflash.
there are businesses that are now discriminating in their hiring practices based on the fact that you are a jw.. sure, you think i'm mad.
but it's true.. the business circles have become acutely aware of the -not even 1 year old- decision in the industrial court where a jw ratted out a fellow jw and brought disrepute to the bank where they both worked.
-
lastmanstanding
Della. You are correct, however, the JWs will tie up the courts trying to make it religious discrimination.
Employers cannot be found guilty of both.
If an employer is held responsible because a religious fruitcake in your employ betrayed their oath for confidentiality, then you cannot be held liable because you chose to not hire the same fruitcake, knowing their religion commands them to betray you and your clients.