Posts by lastmanstanding

27

On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Court Of Appeal Of The State Of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two

by lastmanstanding in

has anyone read and considered the watchtower’s final submission to the supreme court?.

gag.. also, have you read and considered the final submission by zalkin?.

it’s interesting for sure.. zalkin hammers it home.

lastmanstanding

Watchtower responds to Zalkin’s response to Watchtower petition. Think tennis.

Watchtower argues that political types expanded, think of the umbrella again, only since Watchtower umbrella was taken, they hope to scoot under the fairy godmother of California umbrella.

Then Watchtower goes on to complain that their own umbrella was taken away unfairly, when Watchtower tried to use the Clergy umbrella.

I. There are no procedural impediments barring review. California expanded a cause of action that is the subject of constitutional dispute in federal and state courts throughout this country. California also deprived Watchtower of a jury trial by issuing terminating sanctions because Petitioner endeavored to protect citizens’ religious confessional and secular privacy rights. Watchtower consistently asserted the violation of Jehovah’s Witnesses’ federal constitutional rights involved in these issues in the lower courts, the denial of which are properly before this Court.

27

On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Court Of Appeal Of The State Of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two

by lastmanstanding in

has anyone read and considered the watchtower’s final submission to the supreme court?.

gag.. also, have you read and considered the final submission by zalkin?.

it’s interesting for sure.. zalkin hammers it home.

So, Watchtower made their petition to the Supreme Court. And then Zalkin made an opposing position to the court as to why the court should not visit this case. And then Watchtower again responded to Zalkin.

From Zalkin response to Watchtower petition. (Below)

While the Constitutional positions taken in the petition [by Watchtower] are radical and overreaching, this Court need not delve into them before declining review because of the myriad infirmities with the petition itself, which is permeated with blatant misrepresentations and intentionally-deceptive omissions. [Liars] The petition makes no attempt to explain how any of its questions presented were properly preserved. (U.S. Sup. Ct. R. 14(1)(g).) Indeed, the Court of Appeal decision under review (“the Opinion”) did not address any of these allegedly “important” issues because none were presented to it. Nor does the petition explain why the Opinion meets any of the criteria for review identified in Rule 10. (See U.S. Sup. Ct. R. 10, 14(1)(h).) The failures to timely raise and preserve issues, and to comply with Rule 14, each present an independent and adequate basis for denial of the petition. (U.S. Sup. Ct. R. 14(4).) Given that Watchtower’s answer was stricken and its default entered, appellate review is limited to a consideration of whether the Complaint adequately alleges any cause of action. (Steven M. Garber & Associates v. Eskanderian, 150 Cal.App.4th 813, 822–823 (2007).) Watchtower refuses to accept this procedural posture. Instead, it asks this Court to resolve factual issues on a record devoid of facts and to accept factual representations that are either demonstrably false or lacking in evidentiary support because they were never litigated at the trial court level. Watchtower’s positions are inextricably fact based, and because of the default, the facts to adjudicate those claims are not before this Court. Given Watchtower’s disrespect for the legal system, penchant for violating court orders and habitual disregard for the rules of the court from which it is begging for mercy, it is not the litigant to champion any allegedly important issue before this Court. This is not a case that warrants this Court’s time.

Imagine that you have three arguments that you want the court to consider, and that these arguments are sugar cubes. Imagine the court system is a rainstorm.

You must preserve your sugar cubes. You have to get a big umbrella over them, else they wash away.

So, Watchtower made their sugar cubes, and then put an umbrella over them. The court said the umbrella was the wrong one, and they took it away. Then the court system rained on them.

,,, bye bye sugar.

27

On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Court Of Appeal Of The State Of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two

by lastmanstanding in

has anyone read and considered the watchtower’s final submission to the supreme court?.

gag.. also, have you read and considered the final submission by zalkin?.

it’s interesting for sure.. zalkin hammers it home.

lastmanstanding

Barb emailed me both submissions. I didn’t see them here, but I read them. I thought I’d mention them.

I have them in my inbox. I suppose I could upload them. Here? Somewheres else?

Else, I will do a few cut and pastes of the meaningful parts....

27

On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Court Of Appeal Of The State Of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two

by lastmanstanding in

has anyone read and considered the watchtower’s final submission to the supreme court?.

gag.. also, have you read and considered the final submission by zalkin?.

it’s interesting for sure.. zalkin hammers it home.

lastmanstanding

Watchtower has been so very arrogant, showing contempt for the lower courts, and now it bites them in the ass.

Watchtower’s attitude is ‘we don’t deal with peons of lower courts, WE are appointed by GOD, we deal with the top dogs only and even them we shit upon.’

So, they have thumbed their collective noses at the judiciary, as though THEY are the boss, THEY will dictate how it’s all going to go....

The Governing Buffoons are basically telling the court that THEY are higher than the court of this little world and that THEY will make the ruling and the Supreme Court will like it, their job is to just write down what the GBuffoons say and publish it.

My dream is that the Judges understand that and the words in their ruling reflect their disgust.

27

On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Court Of Appeal Of The State Of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two

by lastmanstanding in

has anyone read and considered the watchtower’s final submission to the supreme court?.

gag.. also, have you read and considered the final submission by zalkin?.

it’s interesting for sure.. zalkin hammers it home.

lastmanstanding

Has anyone read and considered the Watchtower’s final submission to the Supreme Court?

GAG.

Also, have you read and considered the final submission by Zalkin?

It’s interesting for sure.

Zalkin hammers it home. The law stipulates that Watchtower is not legally entitled to have the case heard by the Supreme Court.

Watchtower had to have first established Certiorari, in other words validated their claim to fame by first establishing the merits of their case in the lower court. THEY DID NOT!

Watchtower is screwed.

On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari To The Court Of Appeal Of The State Of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two

30

3-File Requests: Destroy Notes BOE--Publications For Discard--Where Are The Nine!

by Atlantis in

jw
friends

2019-08-28 destroy notes.. https://docdro.id/ojsdss2.

2012--2018 publications approved for discard.

https://docdro.id/llottt0.

lastmanstanding

What is the significance of the tract “Where are the nine”..? It’s interesting for sure, to read of the opinion expressed concerning the “preaching”... but what exactly did the OP have in mind?

4

New Jerusalem finds are evidence of Babylonian siege, archaeologists say

by Doug Mason in

https://www.timesofisrael.com/new-jerusalem-finds-are-evidence-of-babylonian-siege-archaeologists-say/ .

lastmanstanding

586-587

I wonder what Watchtower will do.. oh boy.. I guess they will have to miss out on history.

65

Now Canada's Turn

by newsheep in

just got a phone call this morning from a very upset anointed brother.

he said he didn't believe me when i told him about the pedo problem and selling off of halls.

he said he was disgusted with the watchtower and had to go to a special meeting last night.

lastmanstanding

Bottom line. The vigorous selling of Kingdom Halls is antithetical to Watchtology. The org ‘is expanding‘ they are told... but the facts speak a different story.

The selling will have an effect that is quite detrimental to the life of the org.

Psychologically, there will be an impact. Dubs are just people. And people are affected when there is a serious dichotomy.

...As incognito has pointed out.

Contributions will be impacted on several levels. Contributing is done in secret. Dubs will lose some of their pseudo-faith. They will have less heart to dump their hard earned cash in the box. Plus, those who have to drive farther will have less in their pocket due to expenses. Add to that fewer meetings due to age and distance, less opportunity to contribute.

It feeds on itself. It’s like a person that is consuming body fat because of a lack of food.

31

Reddit Post: Watchtower Appeals to Supreme Court

by APieceOfShitNamedTate in

jw
friends

from john redwood.... a preview of upcoming news:.

jehovah's witnesses are appealing to the supreme court of the united states, but this time it has nothing to do with preaching or saluting the flag.. it's all about child abuse.. specifically, the protection (or cover-up) of information, documents, and testimony of persons involved in cases of child abuse.. i will be covering this story in the coming weeks and months, but i thought i would share some of this news and try to distill it down as simply as i can.. i'd like to point out first that watchower has appealed to the supreme court in connection with their loss of yet another california child abuse case.

the chance that watchtower's appeal being will be heard by the supreme court is slim, but anything is possible.. what brought this about?.

lastmanstanding

I’d like to see the Sup. Ct. get into the ring with the GB, just to beat the hell out of them.

The gibbering baboons are so full of themselves. They have convinced themselves that because they have won there before, they will win there every time.

But as pointed out by others, this time is different. They are not there fighting for everyone’s right to worship freely. They are there trying to conceal their filthy underbelly.

I hope the SC gives each and every gb a ‘drive angry’ proctological exam.

18

Serving where the need is nicer

by Xanthippe in

so there isn't a congregation in my town, they come from the congregation about five miles away about twice a year to do fs.. this morning i was driving out of the town on the country roads and there were four jws (obvious by men with briefcases and women in very long dresses).

they seemed to be walking to the next place, a village about 15 minutes walk away.. why not drive?

they must have left the cars in my town!

lastmanstanding

My wife and I just finished service. It just so happens that at every one of our calls, there was a YARD SALE.

We picked up a few nice things today, some outside stuff, tools, supplies etc.

Oh and we did our 2hrs.

I forgot to wear a tie though, and I’m not sure if golf shorts are acceptable but that’s what I had on..... anyway.