"including those bisexual people that will do either or both sexes" - WTWizard
The above made me laugh... I agree with everything you said and think the influence of the Bible will soon wane to the level that the Greek Mythologies have over us.
just some random thoughts here... theme scripture is matt.5: 33 .
we already had a thread explaining that jesus added a "but" after those words.
however, few would argue against the principle of keeping one's word.
"including those bisexual people that will do either or both sexes" - WTWizard
The above made me laugh... I agree with everything you said and think the influence of the Bible will soon wane to the level that the Greek Mythologies have over us.
would like to see your responses ~.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/live/2017/jun/01/donald-trump-paris-climate-agreement-live-news.
kapitan kovfefe is a man of his word - well ...twisted word ~ .
"I am glad you admit it!" - hothabanero
It's not a secret. It's written in the accord. There is no conspiracy and you are not privy to knowledge that is trying to be suppressed.
"The money is much better spend on US soil, for US jobs, to make the US wealthier and GREENER (something this stupid Obama deal would NOT do)." - hothabanero
You miss the point (which is the point of this accord) that it is the developing world that needs to be greener because if it continues the way it is going (i.e. the way the West developed) climate change will destroy your country regardless of what insular policies you implement with the money you saved from removing yourselves from this accord. Developing countries cannot afford such luxuries like cleaner, sustainable energy production so, again, keeping the money in America and making such things will not make you richer (why would they take massive loans from you to buy from you when they can just burn coal in a dirty fashion [there are more ways than one to burn coal jookbeard...] for a fraction of the cost) or greener. Climate affects the entire world...
So which of these options would you prefer:
1 - Invest in these countries to save our world (and maybe encourage its citizens to stay at home).
2 - Allow these countries to advance their industry and economy as we did in previous centuries.
3 - Prevent these countries from advancing and keep them in the 3 world (plus I guess keep complaining about how their citizens want to move to our countries).
would like to see your responses ~.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/live/2017/jun/01/donald-trump-paris-climate-agreement-live-news.
kapitan kovfefe is a man of his word - well ...twisted word ~ .
"Climate change is just one of the many new faces of Communism. It has nothing to do with the environment and everything with the redistribution of wealth." - truth_b_known
What a simple minded observation! If only you understood why distribution of wealth (giving money) was important in this context you might not write such silly things on public forums...
would like to see your responses ~.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/live/2017/jun/01/donald-trump-paris-climate-agreement-live-news.
kapitan kovfefe is a man of his word - well ...twisted word ~ .
Trump is a moron, for many reasons and not just this idiocy.
Yes the agreement was about transferring money from richer to poorer countries. Now why was that?
The West has burnt enormous amounts of fossil fuels to get us to the point we are now economically. Third world countries would also have to also do that to get to where we already are. However with our help (money) they could invest in expensive alternatives to the simple dig and burn methods of energy productions. This is important because to get these countries to our levels of economy and industry would result in the ruination of the planet's climate.
There are 3 choices here:
1 - Invest in these countries to save our world (and maybe encourage its citizens to stay at home).
2 - Allow these countries to advance their industry and economy as we did in previous centuries.
3 - Prevent these countries from advancing and keep them in the 3 world (plus I guess keep complaining about how their citizens want to move to our countries).
every time i've asked this in an existing thread, i've never gotten an answer, so forgive me for starting a new thread in order to ask again.
i simply cannot figure out how to quote someone with the standard yellow box.
i can copy/paste the quote, sure, but nothing i do makes it appear in a yellow box like everyone else.
http://dismythed.blogspot.com.mt/2012/06/are-jehovahs-witnesses-destructive-cult.html.
above is the link to this blog that is fuelled with so much hatred it's unreal.
i commented on this bloggers posts, and told this bloggers how distasteful this bloggers posts are, i never expected it to go public, as this blogger will only post what he/she thinks os acceptable.. this blogger has asked me to show evidence of his/her hatred, only for this blogger to use the age old psychological trick of projecting onto the accusers.
"It is comical that they think their word matters" - From that site's contact form.
Such a disparaging and dismissive comment before you have even aired your views! It is quite clear that the author(s) of that site have no interest in honest debate about a subject that has to be debated. So therefore, what is the point of wasting valuable time with such a cretinous individual(s).
It should also be quite clear that their site is full of copy and paste assertions rather than reasoned arguments based on given evidence.
And finally, just look at the comments left by the apparent owner of that site. That should tell you the education level of the authors of that site.
i have a legitimate question and i am not trying to start a fight.
i keep reading that there were 6 child abuse lawsuits that settled for 13 million dollars.
how do people like barbara anderson or jwsurvey or jwfacts come up with this number?
"callously defend[ing] the indefensible" - Simon
Nicely sums up the majority of RO's posts in my opinion.
i saw this recent account on youtube recently and wondered if anyone had any good spook stories?
haunted books?
ouija boards?
heathen -
You care enough to keep posting about how much you don't care...
"unless a ghost smacks you in the face you don't believe"
Well that would be a start and significantly more than you have been able to give regarding proof....
i saw this recent account on youtube recently and wondered if anyone had any good spook stories?
haunted books?
ouija boards?
There is nothing to address. Parapsychology failed as a way to explain something that has been explained by normal science/psychology. That isn't to say parapsychology failed in and of itself because it did prove that it wasn't ghosts or whatnot i.e. found no reasons to support the notion of anything supernatural; it just failed as an explanation.
As I said initially: The mind plays tricks (verified by psychology etc.,) and people lie (proven on numerous occasions).
i saw this recent account on youtube recently and wondered if anyone had any good spook stories?
haunted books?
ouija boards?
Heathen -
Are you capable of being rational? Or do you simply prefer the comfort of the echo chamber?