.........CONT'D:
5. There is nothing in Daniel's prophecies that can be reasonably construed as visions about the Roman Empire. Such an interpretation would have required a fifth kingdom or empire, which was nowhere indicated in Daniel's prophecies. Christians have read into Daniel's vision what they want to see, that is, references to the Roman Empire. WORLD EVENTS MEAN NOTHING:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112075921/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyPreterism11.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112080821/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyOlivet8.html
6. Daniel did NOT prophesy about the second coming of Jesus and his kingdom. WORLD EVENTS MEAN NOTHING:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112080821/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyOlivet8.html
7. If the author(s) could have accurately predicted the future after 164 BCE, he would have prophesied some additional earthly empires that controlled Palestine:
- The Roman Empire (from 63 BCE)
- Byzantine Empire (from 313 CE)
- Arab conquest; control of Palestine by Muslim groups (from 636 CE)
- Christian Crusaders from Europe (from 1099 CE)
- Mamluks under Saladin reinstate Muslim rule (from 1291 CE)
- Ottoman rule (from 1517 CE)
- British Empire rule (from 1917 CE)
- The State of Israel (1948 CE to the present time)
From the time of Daniel to the present day, Palestine has been controlled by 11 foreign empires until Israel finally attained independence in 1948 CE. The author(s) of the book of Daniel, apparently writing about 166 CE, failed miserably to predict his or her future.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/daniel1.htm
8. Daniel 12, the final chapter, is not a prediction about a future end of history:
In the final chapter of Daniel, the author describes the "end of history" - a resurrection of the dead, judgment and transfer the resurrected dead to heaven or hell. According to Daniel 12:12, these events would happen during approximately three years following the "abomination of desolation" (the erection of a statue of Zeus in the Jewish temple in 167 BCE).
Some Bible scholars have interpreted this period of time as occupying many millennia. But this is clearly not a valid interpretation, because Daniel 12:12 refers to people who "wait and live to see the completion of the interval." That would have happened between 167 and 170 BCE. It clearly did not. The people who "wait and live to see the completion of the interval" died long ago and none of the predicted events have taken place.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/daniel1.htm
9. With the exception of some earlier strands, the book of Daniel was written in the 2nd century BC by someone who forged it as the work of a 6th-century BC Jewish official in the Babylonian and Persian governments in order to encourage his contemporaries involved in the Maccabean conflicts to believe that a prophet had predicted centuries earlier that they would prevail against the oppressions of the Seleucid king Antiochus Epiphanes.
In order to encourage his 2nd-century readers to believe that the Jews would prevail over their oppressors and at long last receive the never-ending kingdom they had been promised, "Daniel" prophesied after the fact in order to make his contemporaries think that a 6th-century BC Jewish official in the Babylonian government had foreseen a reversal of the fortunes that had brought to power four kingdoms that had oppressed the Jews and that that reversal of fortunes was going to result in their finally receiving the everlasting kingdom that their prophets had spoken about.
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112080821/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyOlivet8.html