just got to share this, zizek at his very best.
explaining how the traditional view of the ransom makes no sense and reverts christianity to paganism where god is subject to a superior notion of justice.
how the injunction from jesus to hate mother, father, brothers and sisters is really a call for a non-hierarchical society, of which the holy spirit is a symbol.
Capitalism has been highly disruptive of family structures------SBF redacted
Agreed. It is said that the hunter-gatherers provided (Pygmies still exist) the best supportive environment for families to thrive.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=AaAJQR_9Dg8
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=erZhTPkOLb0
just got to share this, zizek at his very best.
explaining how the traditional view of the ransom makes no sense and reverts christianity to paganism where god is subject to a superior notion of justice.
how the injunction from jesus to hate mother, father, brothers and sisters is really a call for a non-hierarchical society, of which the holy spirit is a symbol.
Except Jesus said nothing about a more egalitarian family structure. He said his followers were unworthy unless they hated their parents and siblings.
This of course is deeply embarrasing so theologians like Zizek make up bullshit influenced by communist ideology-------Cofty
Everybody reinterprets Jesus' sayings to make him not look like the cult leader that he was. The truth is, Jesus was anti-family: https://www.jehovahs-witness.com/topic/5768031571542016/jesus-christ-anti-family
He was not a supporter of family values - Jesus, his disciples, nuns, monks, Catholic priests and the Shakers (who are now extinct) all demonstrate exactly what Jesus meant when it comes to family by the way they live(d) their lives.
just got to share this, zizek at his very best.
explaining how the traditional view of the ransom makes no sense and reverts christianity to paganism where god is subject to a superior notion of justice.
how the injunction from jesus to hate mother, father, brothers and sisters is really a call for a non-hierarchical society, of which the holy spirit is a symbol.
Ruby456,
If subverting the family structure creates the Essentials for Childhood - assuring, safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments - then I am all for it as long as it does not lead to an adverse environment which can have lasting consequences for children’s mental & physical health and development.
just got to share this, zizek at his very best.
explaining how the traditional view of the ransom makes no sense and reverts christianity to paganism where god is subject to a superior notion of justice.
how the injunction from jesus to hate mother, father, brothers and sisters is really a call for a non-hierarchical society, of which the holy spirit is a symbol.
I think Zizek is saying that the subversion of family structure opens the way for egalitarian and non-hierarchical forms of relationship ----------SBF
Subverting the family structure can have wide-ranging health and social consequences for children.
Children need assuring, safe, stable, nurturing relationships and environments. These essentials for childhood can have a positive impact on a broad range of health problems and on the development of skills that will help children reach their full potential:
https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/acestudy/about_ace.html
Adverse environments early in life have lasting consequences for children’s health and development:
http://www.apa.org/science/about/psa/2017/04/adverse-childhood.aspx
A child’s “family, social, and community assets” were critical to helping him or her thrive despite challenges:
http://bigthink.com/stefani-cox/adverse-childhood-experiences-can-be-overcome-with-help.amp
Children need attachment and nurturing relationships, family who listen and respond patiently to them in a supportive way, and pay attention to their physical and emotional needs.
.
hello house,i am sorry for bumping in like this, ii am a newly baptized jehovah witness, i have been a christain all my life any but i love this new insight and teaching,so i am looking to find a jehovah witness lady that can help me grow strong in faith,i would rather meet someone here because we would take time to get to know each other before we meet, this is a light about me,i am 37 , single, never married and have no kids,i have a good sense of humor, i am loving, caring and trustworthy.i'm an easy going person and i try to stay clear of any drama.i am presently in living in lexington,kentucky but willing to move soon.i am a reserved man,now i am ready to settle down and i'm looking for a woman i can vibe with on a spiritual and intellectual level, i want love and commitment,i am intelligent and successful but let me not toot my own horns,thanks for taking your time to read this.attached my picture and i did include my mobile number.+1 913-730-5780looking forward to hearing from you .thanks.
Good sleuthing darkspilver
Is this guy Eddie FERNANDEZ or Eddie MALCOLM?
the authenticity of the old testament account of solomon is being called into question in the news media:.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/king-solomons-fabulous-hidden-gold-mines-are-a-myth-historian-says-194663/.
for the most-part, i don't really want to believe the bible as true, certainly not the j.w version including their stubbornness over 607 and 1914. but there's one prophecy that always makes me stop and wonder if maybe some of the bible was inspired by god, if he or she exists.
.........CONT'D:
5. There is nothing in Daniel's prophecies that can be reasonably construed as visions about the Roman Empire. Such an interpretation would have required a fifth kingdom or empire, which was nowhere indicated in Daniel's prophecies. Christians have read into Daniel's vision what they want to see, that is, references to the Roman Empire. WORLD EVENTS MEAN NOTHING:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112075921/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyPreterism11.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112080821/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyOlivet8.html
6. Daniel did NOT prophesy about the second coming of Jesus and his kingdom. WORLD EVENTS MEAN NOTHING:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112080821/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyOlivet8.html
7. If the author(s) could have accurately predicted the future after 164 BCE, he would have prophesied some additional earthly empires that controlled Palestine:
- The Roman Empire (from 63 BCE)
- Byzantine Empire (from 313 CE)
- Arab conquest; control of Palestine by Muslim groups (from 636 CE)
- Christian Crusaders from Europe (from 1099 CE)
- Mamluks under Saladin reinstate Muslim rule (from 1291 CE)
- Ottoman rule (from 1517 CE)
- British Empire rule (from 1917 CE)
- The State of Israel (1948 CE to the present time)
From the time of Daniel to the present day, Palestine has been controlled by 11 foreign empires until Israel finally attained independence in 1948 CE. The author(s) of the book of Daniel, apparently writing about 166 CE, failed miserably to predict his or her future.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/daniel1.htm
8. Daniel 12, the final chapter, is not a prediction about a future end of history:
In the final chapter of Daniel, the author describes the "end of history" - a resurrection of the dead, judgment and transfer the resurrected dead to heaven or hell. According to Daniel 12:12, these events would happen during approximately three years following the "abomination of desolation" (the erection of a statue of Zeus in the Jewish temple in 167 BCE).
Some Bible scholars have interpreted this period of time as occupying many millennia. But this is clearly not a valid interpretation, because Daniel 12:12 refers to people who "wait and live to see the completion of the interval." That would have happened between 167 and 170 BCE. It clearly did not. The people who "wait and live to see the completion of the interval" died long ago and none of the predicted events have taken place.
http://www.religioustolerance.org/daniel1.htm
9. With the exception of some earlier strands, the book of Daniel was written in the 2nd century BC by someone who forged it as the work of a 6th-century BC Jewish official in the Babylonian and Persian governments in order to encourage his contemporaries involved in the Maccabean conflicts to believe that a prophet had predicted centuries earlier that they would prevail against the oppressions of the Seleucid king Antiochus Epiphanes.
In order to encourage his 2nd-century readers to believe that the Jews would prevail over their oppressors and at long last receive the never-ending kingdom they had been promised, "Daniel" prophesied after the fact in order to make his contemporaries think that a 6th-century BC Jewish official in the Babylonian government had foreseen a reversal of the fortunes that had brought to power four kingdoms that had oppressed the Jews and that that reversal of fortunes was going to result in their finally receiving the everlasting kingdom that their prophets had spoken about.
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112080821/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyOlivet8.html
the authenticity of the old testament account of solomon is being called into question in the news media:.
http://www.christianpost.com/news/king-solomons-fabulous-hidden-gold-mines-are-a-myth-historian-says-194663/.
for the most-part, i don't really want to believe the bible as true, certainly not the j.w version including their stubbornness over 607 and 1914. but there's one prophecy that always makes me stop and wonder if maybe some of the bible was inspired by god, if he or she exists.
The book of Daniel:
1. Is history written as prophecy (or prophecy written after the event):
There is a sudden prophecy failure after a long string of uncanny successes in chapter 11.
http://web.archive.org/web/20061022015215/http://www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/1998/5/985good.html
2. Is a book of historical inaccuracies.
The historical inaccuracies have led scholars to recognize it couldn't have been written by someone who was an important Babylonian official when the events recorded in the book were unfolding.
It is impossible to believe that the mind of Daniel was illumined with accurate knowledge of future times, while, at the same time, thoroughly befogged as to the events in which he himself had played no mean part:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061115025003/http://www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/1998/4/984bad.html
3. The claimed 6th-century BC authorship of the book of Daniel is without basis. Scholars have assigned a 2nd-century BC date:
http://web.archive.org/web/20041221020449/http://www.infidels.org:80/library/magazines/tsr/2001/1/011dan.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20051216195709/http://www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/1998/3/983delib.html
- Gerald A. Larue's book on the Old Testament
- The writer of Daniel knew more about the Grecian empire than the Babylonian and Persian, because he lived much closer to the time of the former.
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112075921/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyPreterism11.html
4. There is a mismatch between the world powers of actual history and the world powers claimed by Christianity.
The interpretation of the empires as:
- Babylon
- Medo-Persia
- Greece and
- Rome
predominates among (early) Christians as among Jews, and writers often see themselves and their readers as thus near the End of which Daniel spoke.
However, according to history, the ACTUAL foreign countries that occupied what is now Palestine between the 6th century and 2nd century BCE are:
- Babylon (symbolized by the lion/eagle symbol and gold in the book of Daniel).
- The Median empire (symbolized by a bear and silver in the book of Daniel).
- The Persian empire (symbolized by a leopard and bronze in the book of Daniel).
- The Greek empire (symbolized by a terrible beast and iron in the book of Daniel).
THERE WAS NEVER A COMBINED MEDO-PERSIAN EMPIRE. WORLD EVENTS MEAN NOTHING:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/daniel1.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/20061022015227/http://www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/2000/2/002what.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20051216195709/http://www.infidels.org/library/magazines/tsr/1998/3/983delib.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20061112080821/http://www.theskepticalreview.com/JFTBobbyOlivet8.html
speaking from my own experience and that of my family of wife and two now adult sons do not believe that prayers to jehovah /god are answered .. so it must also be true of all other religions and their believers also.. my wife and i were jw`s for 33 years and and i don`t believe anyone prayed harder than my wife and i at various trials we faced during those times in those 33 years.. we may as well have been like the present day jews who pray to a brick wall .
Prayer is not open two-way communication nor a gradual increase of understanding.
Though it would be well within his power, God never does something even as simple as replying to a prayer in an actual, audible voice.
The believer sends their prayers into the darkness, usually to be answered by silence, occasionally receiving in response a hazy feeling “within their heart” so to speak, then they thereafter spend their time looking for signs and trying to figure out if whatever subsequently happens is an answer to their prayer because God doesn't tell them if it is - they have to figure it out for themselves.
Human beings may talk to God, but God never talks back, except, so the believers say, in subjective feelings and vague sensations that possess all the explanatory clarity of a Magic 8-Ball.
speaking from my own experience and that of my family of wife and two now adult sons do not believe that prayers to jehovah /god are answered .. so it must also be true of all other religions and their believers also.. my wife and i were jw`s for 33 years and and i don`t believe anyone prayed harder than my wife and i at various trials we faced during those times in those 33 years.. we may as well have been like the present day jews who pray to a brick wall .
http://new.exchristian.net/2010/02/prayer-and-insanity.html?m=1 :
Whenever prayer has been scientifically tested with carefully constructed, double-blind research methods it has always failed. The best known of these is The Study of the Therapeutic Effects of Intercessory Prayer (STEP), conducted under the auspices of Harvard Medical School (2006). It showed, you guessed it, no positive benefit from prayer.
But are the believers buying this? Not on your life! Why not? Well, as one high-profile hospital chaplain said, "God is not subject to scientific research." How does he know this? Well because the research failed to provide a positive outcome, of course. You had to ask?
i know two jehovah's witnesses couple.
the husband had a rough upbringing.
his father left him at a young age, leaving his mom and himself to take care of his siblings.
The resources which I posted above regarding ADVERSE CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES (ACEs) were true to form in the case of my father. His mother died when he was a little boy, he was the eldest of 7 children. His father was not the nurturing, caring type. He and his siblings were split up and sent to live with different family members who weren’t nurturing – his only sister was sexually molested.
He didn’t get the help he needed to deal with the loss of his mother and the attendant trauma. He too lost his childhood and had to grow up fast. True to form, my father became an alcoholic, a heavy smoker and womanizer. He died at age 54 as a result of poor health – 26 years earlier than someone who had zero incidence of ACEs.
