p { margin-bottom: 0.1in; line-height: 120%; }
@bluesbrother
Sorry for your friends’ illness, but he did not suffer from
coronavirus, even though he was told he did. The pcr test can not
honestly be used for diagnostic purposes, as acknowledged by the
manufacturers of it, and by the words of the tests’ inventor
himself. It can only detect fragments of rna/dna (which have no
known specific origin), and it can then “amplify” the amount of
those fragments. Nothing in this process allows for the
identification of any particle with a complete genome, whether
endogenous or exogenous. The “amplified” particles can then be
used for research; that is what pcr was designed for.
When you dishonestly
use this research tool as a test to diagnose disease (supposedly
caused by a specific virus), then you can of course create your own
false narrative. That has been done, and the story is unchallenged
by the public. Other inherent absurdities crop up here with the
‘test’, i.e. false positives, false negatives,
indeterminate….which is the result of not having properly
identified (isolation, purification) the ‘viral’ entity being
blamed in the first place. Now, in order to force a result from the
‘test’, our rna/dna fragment (claimed without proof to be the
virus) is cycled (amplified) many times until it becomes more
‘visible’, and at some arbitrary point the cycling is stopped,
and the result is said to be positive or negative or
indeterminate...fewer cycles, more negatives. More cycles, more
positives. It can be said here that the test ‘result’ is simply
whatever the tester wants it to be, and it becomes obvious that how
many ‘cases’ of coronavirus exist is literally the result of how
many tests are administered. The test IS the virus.
Ditto antibody
testing. When hiv antibody testing was first developed, EVERYONE
tested positive. How to solve this ‘little’ problem? Dilute
your sample 400 times, allowing yourself to say that the intensity
(color gradation) would tell whether one was pos or neg. The
antibody test was testing for proteins, and some proteins were said
to be specific for hiv, but the mechanics of the test itself prove
that this was false, and as time went on it had to be acknowledged
that many proteins (or the amount of them in the sample) would result
in a ‘positive’ result. Yet the perception remained(s), and was
encouraged to remain, that an hiv-positive test result is proof of
hiv infection, and all that supposedly follows in one’s life from
that point….in each case, pcr and antibody testing, there is clear
intent to create infection by virus when the ‘virus’ cannot be
demonstrated to exist in the first place.
You will say that
the virus has been isolated and its genome mapped, but on
investigation you will find that this has been done by the
frankenstein method of computer modeling, not by
isolating/characterizing in reality. Compare this computer modeling
to the computer modeling of Neil Ferguson. Modeling that tells us
what we are supposed to hear and believe.
We are being faked,
and herded, and the intent of this lie should be obvious by what we
are experiencing in real time. Some of those among the controllers
of this psyop are surely laughing (with malice) as they see their
subjects donning the masks (beginning an immediate degradation of
their health due to improper oxygen/carbon dioxide uptake),
anonymizing themselves, distancing themselves from others, ALL of
which factors have a clear negative impact on physical AND mental
health. This is the notion of humans as walking biohazards,
presented to you through an ‘event’ that is not about health, by
a consortium of forces that are not interested in your welfare.
