Climbing Mount Improbable by Richard Dawkins answers very easily how an eye can see...he explains the many possibilities of the evolution of it.
Just read an do research before spouting off nonsense or posting questions without researching the answer yourself.
Notsurewheretogo, I am always intriguid by such claims that sound very, very convinced, but...
Very easily? Because Dawkins explains the many possibilities of the evolution of it?
What does he explain other than modern biology and anatomy? I've seen video's where he connects the dots with video's and animations of modern living species but at the same time he ignores vital parts such as the supposedly evolution of the eye's nerve system and how incredibly complex codes are processed..
How are you sure that all those possibilities can be applied to real natural processes? We haven't observed it, we cannot reproduce it, fossils show already complex eyes during the cambrian, so how can someone really know the gradual evolutionary proces from bottom-up?. Why claim "fact" instead of "maybe" or "we don't know (yet)"?
I believe there is much more time and observation needed before such evolutionary claims can be made with absolute certainty.
I remain sceptical as more research needs to be done...