Well "the-question" user didn't show up. But what an informed lot you are. Very proud to be reading your findings and thoughts. Beats anything written in a Watchtower.
pleaseresearch
JoinedPosts by pleaseresearch
-
82
the-question (607 BCE explained and proved)
by pleaseresearch inso a user named "the-question" said the jw's were right about 607 bce.. this is your chance brother to prove us all wrong.. we all can't wait to hear from you :).
-
-
-
82
the-question (607 BCE explained and proved)
by pleaseresearch inso a user named "the-question" said the jw's were right about 607 bce.. this is your chance brother to prove us all wrong.. we all can't wait to hear from you :).
-
-
pleaseresearch
So a user named "the-question" said the JW's were right about 607 BCE.
This is your chance brother to prove us all wrong.
We all can't wait to hear from you :)
-
29
Actions and consequences of Lot’s wife vs. David
by Yesu Kristo Bwana Wangu inactions and consequences of lot’s wife vs. actions and consequences of david.
genesis 19 talks about how sodom and gomorrah were destroyed.
david under any law: yes, under the law of moses crime: adultery and murder consequence: nothing but blessings from god.
-
-
pleaseresearch
To the original poster, great research and very thought provoking question.
-
24
Scriptures rarely mentioned
by dothemath ina couple of examples of scriptures hardly ever quoted is 1 tim.
2:12- "i do not permit a woman to teach, or to exercise authority over a man, but to be in silence".
or verse 11- "let a woman learn in silence with full submissiveness.".
-
-
pleaseresearch
You can understand why the Churches back in the day didn't want the bible in our hands but only the leaders of the church. If we knew what was in it, we would be like WHAT!!!!! -
-
-
pleaseresearch
Cambridgeshire near Cambridge.
-
27
the Book of Enoch and the Nephilim
by schnell ini've heard all my cognizant life that angels from heaven looked upon the daughters of men, took wives, and their wives bore giants called nephilim.. i've heard all my adult life about the book of enoch and why it's apocryphal and to be avoided.. so tonight i was curious enough to download an e-book and have a look, since dothemath had the thread about rarely used scriptures and the book of jude directly quotes from the book of enoch.. if jude quotes from enoch, shouldn't both or neither of them be canonical?
if you consider jude canonical, then enoch should be too.. hey, how many fallen angels were there again?
two thirds of heaven, right?
-
-
pleaseresearch
The JWs will go on and on about how the Dead Sea scrolls were such an incredible find.
The book of Enoch was in there :) Parts of the original language at least. They were trying to help preserve and save this book.
-
27
the Book of Enoch and the Nephilim
by schnell ini've heard all my cognizant life that angels from heaven looked upon the daughters of men, took wives, and their wives bore giants called nephilim.. i've heard all my adult life about the book of enoch and why it's apocryphal and to be avoided.. so tonight i was curious enough to download an e-book and have a look, since dothemath had the thread about rarely used scriptures and the book of jude directly quotes from the book of enoch.. if jude quotes from enoch, shouldn't both or neither of them be canonical?
if you consider jude canonical, then enoch should be too.. hey, how many fallen angels were there again?
two thirds of heaven, right?
-
-
pleaseresearch
Great points and well researched, thank you. This always made me think the same. If Jude quotes from the book then why wouldn't we refer to it. It made no sense, until I too looked at it and it clicked.
This was interesting that I found from Wikipedia.
Reception[edit]
The Book of Enoch was considered as scripture in the Epistle of Barnabas (16:4)[24] and by many of the early Church Fathers, such as Athenagoras,[25] Clement of Alexandria,[26] Irenaeus[27] and Tertullian,[28] who wrote c. 200 that the Book of Enoch had been rejected by the Jews because it contained prophecies pertaining to Christ.[29] However, later Fathers denied the canonicity of the book, and some even considered the Epistle of Jude uncanonical because it refers to an "apocryphal" work.[30]
-
16
Destruction of false religion, never!
by pleaseresearch inthis was always something i had trouble believing as i was growing up.
now i'm in my 30's i can see this will never happen.
even if the un the nwo whoever forces a global ban on religion.
-
-
pleaseresearch
This was always something I had trouble believing as I was growing up. Now i'm in my 30's I can see this will never happen. Even if the UN the NWO whoever forces a global ban on religion. It will still go on in private by all religions. But the big one that would never accept this, are Muslims.
I'm sure a lot deep down would love the idea of the shackles taken off them. I in fact feel more sorry for them than us ex JW's They have a much harder time to leave and even lose their lives.
-
10
Justice catches up with 101-year-old paedophile. Not a JW but.....
by pleaseresearch inwas in the car listening to the radio of a 101 year old pedophile.
i loved the detective who spoke and said "the day that not prosecuting someone who hurts a child is not in the public interest, we may as well all just pack up and go home.".
this makes me feel sick to my stomach even more at what the australian royal commission investigated.. .
-
-
pleaseresearch
Yeah it's front page of the BBC now. Great news hey. This should move the Watchtower to similar action. If they did that it sure would help repair their image. While they sit on all this evidence that could potentially put thousands behind bars for their crimes. It will not do anything to help their image one bit to do nothing. If they came out, handed it all over to the authorities and said "investigate" that would show they are trying to help. But we all know this will never happen.
-
10
Justice catches up with 101-year-old paedophile. Not a JW but.....
by pleaseresearch inwas in the car listening to the radio of a 101 year old pedophile.
i loved the detective who spoke and said "the day that not prosecuting someone who hurts a child is not in the public interest, we may as well all just pack up and go home.".
this makes me feel sick to my stomach even more at what the australian royal commission investigated.. .
-
-
pleaseresearch
prologos I remember that. I forget where that came from, do you mind reminding me. I think it may have been a BOE letter. If anyone can help, thank you.