shady dealings with human trafficking
I am intrigued. Did poor ol' Joe sometimes confuse Amway and Epsteins Lolita express?
a month ago it might have been questionable.
not now.
after bader’s death and biden’s inability, this shouldn’t be close.
shady dealings with human trafficking
I am intrigued. Did poor ol' Joe sometimes confuse Amway and Epsteins Lolita express?
a month ago it might have been questionable.
not now.
after bader’s death and biden’s inability, this shouldn’t be close.
As a corollary, when republicans point out voter-fraud and decide to fight for a fair count using the court system and the legally available powers, democrats will claim there is a minuscule amount of voter fraud and the election is being stolen.
If we can identify voter fraud just on this thread (as appears to be the case ), one should keep an open mind as to what might happen in the election...
a month ago it might have been questionable.
not now.
after bader’s death and biden’s inability, this shouldn’t be close.
Voter fraud, in the context of the 2020 US election, is the concern that hostile foreign powers or domestic actors will flood the system with thousands of fraudulent votes. This is a very real concern and has been raised multiple times not only by Donald trump, but also serious figures like Bill Barr, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAsOtb1_FLg, who has access to the relevant facts.
This concern, which could steal the 2020 election, is entirely different from a single person speculating, probably in jest, he might vote on behalf of his spouse who no doubt would vote the same as him anyway. In one case ballots are being made up by the thousands, and in the other an already printed ballot is simply filled out. One case is a very minor issue which could hypothetically result in a small fine, the other is felony and a multi-year stint in federal prison.
Equating and both-siding the two situations serves nobody but Joe Biden and the people who are interested in stealing the 2020 US election.
a month ago it might have been questionable.
not now.
after bader’s death and biden’s inability, this shouldn’t be close.
Good on you Betheliesalot! Just be careful because it might be a bit illegal to vote on her behalf, although it is in good service!
a month ago it might have been questionable.
not now.
after bader’s death and biden’s inability, this shouldn’t be close.
That chart is a misleading claim. Most of these are just the same handful of things Trump say often that the MSM has decided is false.
I judge Trump by his actions, as do most voters. Playing gotcha politics is why the democrats loose.
a month ago it might have been questionable.
not now.
after bader’s death and biden’s inability, this shouldn’t be close.
Trump would be neglecting his duties if he did not ask other countries to keep an eye out on Hunter Biden considering he was involved in one known corruption scandal in Ukraine. The man is a crime machine and this information could be used to blackmail Joe Biden if he won.
I am a conservative, but I usually describe myself as a classical liberal.
a month ago it might have been questionable.
not now.
after bader’s death and biden’s inability, this shouldn’t be close.
"How about his actions of trying gain information from other countries against his political opponents in the US. ?"
This didn't actually happen. Russiagate is a lie/fabrication.
"How about his many acts of contrived dishonesty on many important subject matters like the Covid virus"
Trump saved the economy and did a great job. The democrats are trying to create a panic.
The Trump administration has, despite a few rough tweets, been exemplary compared to the rule-breaking mess that was the Obama administration. Remember Bengazi?
a month ago it might have been questionable.
not now.
after bader’s death and biden’s inability, this shouldn’t be close.
The democrats are openly campaigning on court packing and fundamentally and changing the structure of the USA and it's constitution to ensure their rule for the next 30 years.
Simon is right. There will be one abnormality after another. This is already planned, which can be known by how they are trying to frame the issue beforehand. They foresee a situation where the federal government may have to step in to ensure a fair count by seizing ballot boxes, and frame that as a coup. They foresee a situation where the supreme court may have to resolve a dispute over illegally cast mail-in ballots and therefore RBGs death scare them.
This will not succeed, and I think Trump will win in a landslide after it once more turns out the polls were wrong. Then it will be Ivanka 2024 (if not Trump for a third term).
Holy hell, the NYTimes is openly advocating court packing https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/19/opinion/ruth-bader-ginsburg-death-supreme-court-nomination.html
I would recommend "how democracies die" as reading for this moment. Court packing marks the end of a dying democracy. After the courts have been packed, everything becomes legal for the ruling class.
The democrats can say what the like. A 6:3 supermajority in the court is not only what the voters want, but it will ensure issues such as voter fraud and other subversive activities can be dealt with efficiently. I suspect this may be necessary to guarantee a desirable outcome of this election.
RIP RBG.
If the liberals are allowed to pack the courts, democracy is not dying, it is dead. This cannot be allowed to happen.
The McConnell rule states that no party which only holds presidency, and not the senate, should expect the senate to help him in voting through a supreme court justice in his last year. This is a sensible provision which allows voters a say; indeed, it only states that a separate branch of government should act as such and leave the matter to voters. No wonder the democrats hate it.
This has nothing to do with the present situation which is, simply, that a seat has opened, and it is perfectly consistent with all law and practice to nominate and allow the senate to vote for a supreme court justice. Indeed, considering the supreme court might need to decide matters about the election, it would be unwise to leave the seat open.