SweetGrass, said:
Good article Believer, I have never heared of the Nones. So as I don't prescribe to any religion but am open to the idea of creation by a powerfull force, would that class as being one of the nones? Although I can't accept the 'loving' bit of a powerfull creating force.
People who don’t subscribe to a particular religion, but still believe in God ARE the Nones. And like you, many who aren’t aware of that subgroup label themselves as agnostics or something along that line since they can’t subscribe wholly to atheism.
This new group of believers, myself included, are troublesome to true atheists. Since they cannot pigeonhole us into a particular religion, they are stumped. Atheists can’t reach us with their rhetoric. Most of their arguments are like striking the wind. It’s like I was saying to Liberator yesterday about the folly of atheists trying to force believers us to accept either the whole Bible or none of it. That’s a self-serving demand designed to set believers up for ‘the kill.’ But like Jonathan Livingston Seagull, "Nones" fly away unscathed!
The bible does not shout 'loving creator' for me in any way.
The Bible is an example of evolving religious thought. The OT describes God as primitive and crude, whereas Jesus in the NT describes God as being loving and benevolent. It’s not two different Gods, it’s a progression of understanding. As he said, he did not come to destroy, but to fulfill, finish and conclude the old way of thinking. Jesus did not view God as anthropomorphological. To Jesus, God was a benevolent Spirit. So while the OT may not scream loving creator, Jesus certainly did.
And btw, Jesus did not start a religion. Paul started Christianity. He founded it on Jesus’ teachings, but he added things that Jesus did not teach. There are a lot of “Nones” who follow Jesus but do not identify with traditional Christianity. I include myself in that group.