Posts by Bobby2446

38

UK IndependentUK Commission on Child Sexual Abuse possible new, separate inquiry into JWs

by Lostandfound in

the guardian newspaper today reports that the iccsa has received “numerous” reports relating to child sexual abuse among jehovahs witness's, and it is possible they will establish an entirely separate inquiry into these reports.

the government set up the iccsa independnt inquiry into child sexual abuse some time ago and their has been a delay in the inquiry operating as thw role of chair s established.. typo in heading, sorry .

Bobby2446

My “charges” comment was more in reference to JWsurvey contributors sensationalize comment of the GB being charged with a crime as a result of IICSA.

IISCA also is merely a legislative hearing as as well. It’s simply stupid and asinine to even suggest that anyone can be charged with a crime without any proof of a crime, by a body that isn’t a judicial body, that has NO POWERS other than to make suggestions/recommendations to lawmakers.

Also the ARC was not a court case either, with no standards of evidence, even revisiting cases long adjusdicated in court.

So do not be surprised if I take the ARC findings with grain of salt.

38

UK IndependentUK Commission on Child Sexual Abuse possible new, separate inquiry into JWs

by Lostandfound in

the guardian newspaper today reports that the iccsa has received “numerous” reports relating to child sexual abuse among jehovahs witness's, and it is possible they will establish an entirely separate inquiry into these reports.

the government set up the iccsa independnt inquiry into child sexual abuse some time ago and their has been a delay in the inquiry operating as thw role of chair s established.. typo in heading, sorry .

Bobby2446

I have no reason to lie. You, however, are caught dead to rights.

I guess I am “Bob” the apparent owner of that site as well, since we all have the same username. Or I am “Bob” who is on Facebook too. You are just throwing something against the wall because you are caught.

At any rate, this is off topic. Believe what you want.

38

UK IndependentUK Commission on Child Sexual Abuse possible new, separate inquiry into JWs

by Lostandfound in

the guardian newspaper today reports that the iccsa has received “numerous” reports relating to child sexual abuse among jehovahs witness's, and it is possible they will establish an entirely separate inquiry into these reports.

the government set up the iccsa independnt inquiry into child sexual abuse some time ago and their has been a delay in the inquiry operating as thw role of chair s established.. typo in heading, sorry .

Bobby2446

I guess my “disobedience” is just as glaring as your hypocrisy in faking like you’re a “faithful” brother on the “Jwtalk” forum you told me about.

Yeah I read your fake posts on the public forum, but don’t worry, I won’t create an account there and rat you out, though I should.

38

UK IndependentUK Commission on Child Sexual Abuse possible new, separate inquiry into JWs

by Lostandfound in

the guardian newspaper today reports that the iccsa has received “numerous” reports relating to child sexual abuse among jehovahs witness's, and it is possible they will establish an entirely separate inquiry into these reports.

the government set up the iccsa independnt inquiry into child sexual abuse some time ago and their has been a delay in the inquiry operating as thw role of chair s established.. typo in heading, sorry .

Bobby2446

lol every site owner reserves the right to determine what speech is acceptable or not, so I abide by those rules, or I don’t join.

So to directly answer you, no.

38

UK IndependentUK Commission on Child Sexual Abuse possible new, separate inquiry into JWs

by Lostandfound in

the guardian newspaper today reports that the iccsa has received “numerous” reports relating to child sexual abuse among jehovahs witness's, and it is possible they will establish an entirely separate inquiry into these reports.

the government set up the iccsa independnt inquiry into child sexual abuse some time ago and their has been a delay in the inquiry operating as thw role of chair s established.. typo in heading, sorry .

Bobby2446

So IICSA also stated that they are not opening any new investigations, but will consider calls for one into JW’s “carefully” — meaning they are not going to be pressured or rush into it.

They are apparently being fair minded, seeing how they have been in communication with JWs since last summer.

38

UK IndependentUK Commission on Child Sexual Abuse possible new, separate inquiry into JWs

by Lostandfound in

the guardian newspaper today reports that the iccsa has received “numerous” reports relating to child sexual abuse among jehovahs witness's, and it is possible they will establish an entirely separate inquiry into these reports.

the government set up the iccsa independnt inquiry into child sexual abuse some time ago and their has been a delay in the inquiry operating as thw role of chair s established.. typo in heading, sorry .

Bobby2446

Sorry to lay a wet blanket on your fire (well, I’m actually happy to), there was an “email IICSA” campaign last August (about 8 months ago) that opposers spread, and IICSA had basically a cookie-cutter reply of we are taking your email into “consideration”. That’s it. Not to mention a petition to IICSA that had over 3,000 signatures. Now the journalist is willing to take unconfirmed “stories”. It’s really pathetic how desperate they have become.

And IICSA has been rife with controversy and corruption since its inception, with child abuse victims even criticizing it.

The ARC surely did not result in charges being brought against any GB member nor a membership reversal, neither did the Charity Commission, and neither will this. I personally have no issue with any body doing an investigation.

45

Padron Case Settled. What happens to the fine?

by Slidin Fast in

it seems that irwin zalkin has obtained undisclosed settlement in the case.

the $4000 a day fine then seems to be dead.

the downside?

Bobby2446

Of course I read the comments. He seemed to be implying the GB are getting off because they aren’t being criminally prosecuted.

But there needs to be evidence of a crime first.

My bad if I misunderstood.

45

Padron Case Settled. What happens to the fine?

by Slidin Fast in

it seems that irwin zalkin has obtained undisclosed settlement in the case.

the $4000 a day fine then seems to be dead.

the downside?

Bobby2446

Sure I am all for someone settling if they want.

But the GB simply cannot go to jail because they cannot be charged with a crime someone else committed.

Thats like saying your boss can be thrown in jail because one of his employees robs a bank. It’s quite a silly thing to even entertain.

Unless the GB specifically tells elders “do not report even when mandated by law” then nothing criminally can happen to them.

45

Padron Case Settled. What happens to the fine?

by Slidin Fast in

it seems that irwin zalkin has obtained undisclosed settlement in the case.

the $4000 a day fine then seems to be dead.

the downside?

Bobby2446

Sanchey,

No, I don’t run ANY webpage. My display name is merely a pseudonym, if that’s what you are trying to connect.

45

Padron Case Settled. What happens to the fine?

by Slidin Fast in

it seems that irwin zalkin has obtained undisclosed settlement in the case.

the $4000 a day fine then seems to be dead.

the downside?

Bobby2446

How are “digitally loaded meetings” (whatever that means) taking their toll when they are barely two years old?

We LIVE in a digital world, so it something we have all grown used to. Heck, the DVD is even soon to be archaic as the demand for downloadable movies has grown.

The response the GB has gotten is overwhelmingly supportive of the JWB monthly programs (which are digital and the reason why they green-lit its translation into more languages).

I seriously believe you are talking out of your arse.