Um, I don’t think I’m wrong.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/2001/02/18/ex-elder-challenges-jehovahs-witnesses-on-child-abuse/6adbfd21-20ca-4ebd-8993-f71fae88fc5f/?utm_term=.0fa206d323c0
When asked, JR Brown cleared that up 15 years ago, stating the rule included other evidence instead of “a second witness”.
But seeing how emotional you are, the manual supports my point of corroboration (accusation of the same kind of wrongdoing in a separate incident).
So I am not wrong. You’re just emotional, your appeal to authority notwithstanding.