anyone else also hold this view or understand it at least, or do you feel the need to argue that both can in no way coexist?.
@Hadriel - ok, we've established that you don't know how abiogenesis occurred. Ignoring the fact that scientific progress is being made toward an answer I'd be interested to know your thought process?
Tell us how you came to jump from not knowing how abiogenesis happened into taking on the possibility that an all powerful deity sparked it off?
a girl i've known my entire life who supported me from a distance after i was disfellowshipped sent me this message on instagram today: .
let me know when your back... i'm unfollowing you on ig & snap.
i love you.
Take her advice. Be decisive. Tell you'll be there for her when she manages to free herself from a controlling religion.
"the only way to understand the press is to remember that they pander to their readers prejudices"the guardian?
london-centric middle-class liberal-left chattering-class.daily circulation of the guardian around 170,000 copies, compared to say the daily mail's daily circulation of around 1,500,000.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgscoauww2m.
Landy,
Diana, as in Princess Di? Hasn't she been dead for quite a while?? What do they write about her??
God knows - but the last one was only a day ago.
his name was unas, he started his rule in 2375 bce .
some how he found out about noah and his ark and i'm thinking around the year 2371 he travel to northern mesopotamia to get on the ark.
(wt says the flood happened 2370-2369 bce) either he bribed noah (since gods covenant was only for noah and his family) or he hid away on the ark.
Sounds legit ...
jehovahs witnesses think that just the bible is proof that god exists but they are wrong.
there is another mode for how he exists.
now we all know many scientists who are creationists now weren’t creationists until they examined the evidence for themselves.
HEL is just a troll
"the only way to understand the press is to remember that they pander to their readers prejudices"the guardian?
london-centric middle-class liberal-left chattering-class.daily circulation of the guardian around 170,000 copies, compared to say the daily mail's daily circulation of around 1,500,000.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgscoauww2m.
The daily fail headlines are either immigration, Maddie Mcann or Diana.
The Guardian is left wing-ish but pretty good.
The independent is more centre.
Murdoch owned papers are conservative.
let me ask you only one question.
first i need to clarify a few things.
in the new world translation, john 1:1 reads: “in [the] beginning the word was, and the word was with god, and the word was a god.” then in isaiah 9:6 (nwt) we read: “for there has been a child born to us, there has been a son given to us; and the princely rule will come to be upon his shoulder.
Crabby - you do realise no one reads your long C&Ps don't you?
all us creationists try to do is offer true evidence that the one and only god is out there watching and looking down on us.
we present that certain scientists know the truth about god and that he is everything that we see from trees, life, weather, the air we breath, and even the most simple molecules.
but of course you atheists reject it because it is your nature to not be humble and see god because you want to rule your own life.
Because someone doesn't agree with you they're hateful?
Stinky bait.
1/10
has anybody actually bought the grauniad?.....
from the grauniad, saturday 13 august 2016, page 14. bottom right hand side (ie in middle by fold/spine) and below a huge review of the new computer game no man's sky.
link to image below.
It's about exactly the same article - it's the same subject.
has anybody actually bought the grauniad?.....
from the grauniad, saturday 13 august 2016, page 14. bottom right hand side (ie in middle by fold/spine) and below a huge review of the new computer game no man's sky.
link to image below.
Reposting the same thing again and again just dilutes the discussion, not to mention being fucking annoying.
