I vogued to Madonna in the 90s
You disgust me. :(
;)
i remember that we were always encouraged to let everyone at work know that you were one of jw's and therefore would not participate in any of their functions, parties etc.. this i outrightly refused to do.
my reasoning was that i was employed and paid to do a job and therefore my religious beliefs were a personal matter and therefore had nothing to do with my work.
secondly i had to work with these people.
I vogued to Madonna in the 90s
You disgust me. :(
;)
i have never understood this.
was it because of legal reasons?
i cant think of any other reason why it wouldn't be allowed, but i know the elders ask you repeatedly that you are not taping.
If you want to record the meeting just fess up right at the start that you are recording and will be happy to provide the committee with a copy if they request one.
Don't negotiate the point, you are recording and that's that. Just remind them that if they choose to terminate the meeting you will expect no action to be taken against you.
If you refuse to stop taping and terminate the JC you will be deemed unrepentant and disfellowshipped in your absence.
if it gets as far as the JC and you don't want to be DF'd then, barring any procedural errors, your only way is to plead repentance and then fade away.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3823706/european-human-rights-chiefs-orders-british-press-not-reveal-terrorists-muslims.html.
"european human rights chiefs have told the british press it must not report when terrorists are muslim.
thank goodness they are getting out of the eu, before like sweden even people in uk can get arrested for posting on social media posting any facts and problems the immigrants/muslims/or refugees are causing.
I think you can safely assume anything printed in the daily fail is absolute bollocks.
so, just chilling and watching much music (canadian mtv).. you can call me al is playing.
(this particular song is meh).
paul simon is a tremendous artist.. in my top-ten of american musical artists..
Graceland is one of the all time greats.
A superb lyricist.
what a horror.
instead of there being "more fish in the sea" our marriage mates came from the small and crapy witness pond.
anyone got burned by going with mr or mrs you will have to do?
As a young guy, I'd often get very bummed
Sounds painful!
while reading the magazines the other day it occurred to me that jws never really had a very good answer to that question.
because it was aimed at young people and it said something along the lines, "if you believe in god you have a purpose, but if you don't believe in god your life has no purpose or meaning".
i think that is a faulty analysis of the situation.
Are we there yet?
while reading the magazines the other day it occurred to me that jws never really had a very good answer to that question.
because it was aimed at young people and it said something along the lines, "if you believe in god you have a purpose, but if you don't believe in god your life has no purpose or meaning".
i think that is a faulty analysis of the situation.
...that I never, ever, would think about beating or punishing a woman unless she was my wife or daughter.
Nice. Is that what good christians do these days, beat their wives and daughters?
i am still having issues with my still in wife.
my two son's and i don't want anything to do with the cult.
our marriage is a battle ground all the time.
Maybe stop trying to convert her? Don't talk about JWism and just enjoy your marriage. Try to rekindle your friendship and spend time together.
There's lots of couples where one goes to the meetings and the other doesn't who have perfectly good relationships. The key is accepting that the other person has free will and can do what they want to.
Just accept that being a JW is her 'hobby' and let her get on with it.
She may come out at some point, she may not. One thing is for sure is that if you keep challenging her beliefs when she's not ready for them to be challenged she will become more entrenched.
while reading the magazines the other day it occurred to me that jws never really had a very good answer to that question.
because it was aimed at young people and it said something along the lines, "if you believe in god you have a purpose, but if you don't believe in god your life has no purpose or meaning".
i think that is a faulty analysis of the situation.
If anything, a reality without a supreme being seems even more mysterious to me!
Ancient civilisations across the world have agreed with you, yet all their 'mysterious' things have all been explained through scientific endeavour.
yes there are things we don't understand but scientists revel in uncertainty - it gives them something to work at and they'll get there eventually.
Every year that passes the universe is just a little less mysterious.
while reading the magazines the other day it occurred to me that jws never really had a very good answer to that question.
because it was aimed at young people and it said something along the lines, "if you believe in god you have a purpose, but if you don't believe in god your life has no purpose or meaning".
i think that is a faulty analysis of the situation.
I know of no logical way to exclude this possibility, therefore I do not think the God of the Bible has been disproved.
I know of no logical way to exclude this possibility, therefore I do not think the existence of unicorns has been disproved.
I know of no logical way to exclude this possibility, therefore I do not think the existence of werewolves has been disproved.
I know of no logical way to exclude this possibility, therefore I do not think the existence of lepricorns has been disproved.
Is the penny dropping yet?
For someone who likes philosophy you seem spectacularly ignorant of Russell's teapot.