This is incorrect. Evolution is Evolution. Abiogenesis is Abiogenesis. They are completeley separate. Evolution does not rely on Abiogenesis for support. You don't have to accept Abiogenesis to accept Evolution. In fact, many (maybe most?) people in the world don't.
Really? What would you call the transition bewtween abiogenesis (no life) to biogenesis (life)? In order for life to be, it had to EVOLVE out of DEAD CHAOTIC CHEMISTRY (abio) into fully ordered and COMPLEX systems (bio). Evolving is going UP in order and complexity BY ITSELF with NO intelligence. To go from abio (dead) to bio (life) is EVOLUTION in the broadest sense of the word.
That is why many Christians and other theists and deists accept Evolution. Evolution conforms with all of the facts.
How does evolution conform with this fact?:
There are no actual transitional links in the fossil record to support the theory of evolution. All of the species of plants and animals along with their biological parts, traits, and characteristics are found already fully-formed or complete within the fossil record. For example, not a single fossil with part fins/part feet has been discovered to show that fish had evolved into amphibians. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species to indicate that there ever was a process of evolution going on.
There are, however, enough facts to support Evolution beyond a shadow of a doubt.
You have shown NOT ONE FACT. You have only uttered the existence of these FACTS without preseting them. Here is another fact:
Nowhere PRESENTLY, do we see animal species with transitional or partially evolved legs, eyes, skin, brain, or various other tissues, organs, and biological structures as evidence that evolution is still occurring. We should be seeing in-between stages of macro-evolution occurring all around us right now if Darwinian evolutionary process is a reality.
Oh yes, evolutionists do have their FEW supposed transitional links, but even they admit, that they are not indisputable.
As for the transitional links themselves, the fact is if macro-evolution really occurred with all the variety and varience of life we see now, there should be billions of billions of anatomically indisputable transitional forms in the fossil record instead of just one or two questionable ones which even all evolutionists themselves can't even agree upon.
So, where's the facts you are professing?
Anyone who looks at the facts and denies the reality of Evolution is being intellectually dishonest.
Again, another portrayal of facts that are never presented. Show your "facts" would you?
They are forcing the observed facts to conform with their ancient religious text. And when that doesn't work, they outright deny the facts. That is intellectual dishonesty in the extreme.
Again the elusive evolutionary "facts." Where for art thou facts of evolution you keep talking about?
Evolution is not a theory that tries to avoid giving creative credit to a personal original cause. It is just a scientific theory that explains the facts well. It says nothing of the origins of life... only of the origins and changing of species. Repeat after me: Abiogenesis is not Evolution.
You are right, abiogenesis is DEATH. Biogenesis is life and has nothing to do with evolution. Life procreates according to it's KIND exactly as God had created, exactly as we see now with NO transitions in the fossil record (which should be in the billions of billions) or as we see in our world now.
You keep arguing a straw man. Shame on you!
Show some FACTS, maybe we'll see the real straw man.