"How does a MAN get appointed as a Circuit Overseer?"
It's not what you know. . .it's who you know.
It's not who you know. . .it's who you blow.
It's not what you do. . .it's who you do.
Did I miss any others?
who is a spiritual man according to wtbts?.
this post will resonate most with people who have been long associated with jws and have seen a dramatic change in the spirituality of traveling overseers over the years..
how does a man get appointed as a circuit overseer?
"How does a MAN get appointed as a Circuit Overseer?"
It's not what you know. . .it's who you know.
It's not who you know. . .it's who you blow.
It's not what you do. . .it's who you do.
Did I miss any others?
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
@Viviane
I didn't think so.
Perhaps a joke would help improve your disposition?
What is the difference between a woman with PMS and a rabid pit bull?
Jewelry.
You are welcome,
Just for fun I had a jwtalk account. The typical JDubya's there are rabid worshipers of men. Of course one cannot be too worshipful, or you will be banned for that too.Reading the linked post I imagine that was sarcasm on the part of the newbie, and he will be banned in two or three more comments for "not being a good fit."
while many think that the ruling is good for the gays and their response is: how does that affect your marriage; then on the other side the religious people cry god and sinners.
but both are missing the forest through the trees.. the problem with the ruling is that which is discussed here so many times.
five unelected federal officials decided on policy for the whole country, running roughshod over every democratic principle.
@Viviane
Not wading into this pointless back-and-forth argument that neither side can win, but I wonder have you ever made any comment to another person on here that was polite, and positive?
A simple yes, or no without snarky comebacks would be great, if you can do it.
2005...three billion people live on less than $2.50 a day.
at least 80% of humanity lives on less.
than $10.00 a day.
new here... been lurking for some time now.... i still serve... but with each passing day, it gets harder and harder.
i'm slowly... slowly working on my wife (i call her mrs. hardcore) and even my m-i-l (who taught my wife how to be hardcore).
making some amazing progress... they are still hardcore... but unrecognizable from a couple years ago!.
"...if you stick to the Bible, what can they really say?"
If it's good for a gibbering body member to say that, surely I can say it too!
2005...three billion people live on less than $2.50 a day.
at least 80% of humanity lives on less.
than $10.00 a day.
You tell me , do God give a damn?
In one word. . .NO!
i have looked at the jw talk forums every now and again.
is it any use making a profile to get in?
mainly just to laugh at the pathetic discussion that they carry on with.
I slipped on over there some time ago and created a profile. Funny thing was I parroted all the governing pope worshiping buIIshlt on any comment I made and those assholes still banned me, even though NOTHING I said was against their cult mantra's!
I even used my name and they ASSumed it was fake!
Well they put the final nail in the coffin containing the last vestiges of any desire to be associated with those assholes, thank GOD! Now I will be even more forceful in my comments at the meetings I must endure for the sake of family in this "captive" religion!
I hope they all rot and burn in hell when they get there!
at around 4 minutes into the september 2015 video splane said "for the man and the baby to be part of josephs generation they would have had to have lived at least some time during joseph's lifespan.".
this is the lynchpin of the wt argument, that two lives must overlap to be considered the same generation.. let's take an example of twins who are born just a few minutes apart.
obviously, these twins are the same generation as each other.
I am really excited about this "new" explanation of what a generation is.
My great-grandfather was born in the early 1860's. His son, my grandfather was of the same generation being born before GG died. My father was of the same generation as his father, who was of the same generation as my great-grandfather. Still with me? Now I am of the same generation that my father is because we are both still alive. Now seeing that my father, and his father are of the same overlapping generation as my great-grandfather, and I am of the same generation as BOTH of them, that means I am of the same multiple overlapping generation as my great-grandfather. And we were only born one hundred years apart.
So, i know that isn't the exact way Splane 'splaned things, but it makes the same amount of sense.
check his signature... it looks kind of childish/feminine (at least in my part of the world)... is this a grown man's signature for you?.
http://www.childabuseroyalcommission.gov.au/downloadfile.ashx?guid=9d0ca1dc-1bd6-41c4-9cfc-b1d616d1cc65&type=exhibit&filename=stat.0670.001.0001&fileextension=pdf.
Noticed too that the assertion was made that "guilt" was already established as an assumption.
Then he claimed that the referred to verses only dealt with the woman's fault, using the statement that prior verses mandated two or more witnesses.
If they are going to take that literally in that manner, why do those nit wits shave their faces? Lev. 19: 27
Straining out the gnat while gulping down the camel!