no im not dishonest about picking scriptures. the bible is presented in its entirety as the word of god. examining and find problems are a test it should pass with flying colours. if there was a god, he would expect us not to accept a second fraud with contradictions, mistakes, lies, fabrications and laws that are obviously inserted by vile men.
firstly if you believe in christ, then you shoukd ask and be able to answer wyy did jesus bother and respect the ot as gods law? why was he not angry or did not mention the ot was a fraud and blasphemy. the fact is his actions, respect for traditions like the passover, circumcision, sabbath show he was very much a jew who accepted and bekieved.
regarding ruth, please dont start teling me about ancient customs, i know enuff about some of their many superstituions and similar nonsense. those books are presented as gods word for us to learn from it, not an exercise in watching some barbarians. no one should waste their time listening to those for morality or godly advice.
after all that fraud in ot, gospels and other nt books, how do jnow what is real and what is myth or political propoganda? the jesus story is a fraud like everything else in religion. there is no historical proof for jesus outside the bible. matthew is an established liar, mark makes the basic geogrpahic mistakes and has no resurrection or ascension. luke is also riddled with errors, while john seems to be teling quite a dufferent stiry from the synootic gospeks. then we have the curious case of paul not mentioning a single fact about jesus ministry except he is our lord who died for us. does paul really nknmow jesus, he doesnt emention nazareth, mary, any of the apostles, how or where jesus ministered or died?