jgnat:
I want to comment on your bringing up one of my more speculative predictions. It is somewhat of a personal attack and is therefore a diversion from what we are discussing.
It is a way of saying SINCE Proplog2 has in times past made faulty predictions THEREFORE all of his comments about the Bible and Future events are faulty.
This is a false premise. It is irrelevant what I have said in the past. Just as it is irrelevant what the Watchtower has said in its past. It IS important to analyze what is currently being said by a person and evaluate their premises and conclusions.
The post I made (which you so kindly pulled up) - dealt with a specific convergence of somewhat significant events. My prediction failed. I don't consider that much different than a Doctors prognosis about the course of a disease. Or perhaps a weatherman's failed forecast. Doctors and Meteorologists don't lose their licences if they make a mistake. My mistake was not in the basic information (which we are discussing here) but in my intuitive leap based upon certain unfolding events. Kind of "cloudy with a chance of Armageddon". or "take two of these and wait for the Great Tribulation".
I believe its good to develop a strong interpretive base from which it is possible to view significant actions and actors on the world stage and Occasionally stick out your neck and make a prediction. I never have claimed divine guidance - I don't believe in God (guess I lose any potential audience right there).
I have yet to see anyone come up with a more coherent explanation for the endtime scenario than the one I have been talking about for 25 years. The preterist expanation is born dead. It is a Procrustes bed of failed attempts to fit events that were familiar to the original authors. The sole reason they (preterists) take this direction is that they refuse to believe in even the possibility that anyone could know the future. Yet the writers of Daniel and Revelation spoke about a future they didn't understand - and they referred to it as the "end".
You are entitled to your assumptions about the meaning of "time of the end". And you probably have a very good fit (not pefect) for those events. But for those who believe there is yet a "time of the end" (after all we ARE still here) I think I have a 99% fit. And I want to entertain challenges to my interpretation by those who believe we are in the "time of the end".
And there are stronger reasons for believing that Mankind IS facing a castastrophe. Ever since the coming of the Nuclear age it has become possible for a few people to make decisions that could lead the world into an abyss. All the advancements in science and culture could disappear into a dark age of nulcear destruction. I was born a month before Hiroshima. My generation has learned to "live" with this possibility. We even dare to just call it a "possibility" rather than an "inevitablity". Your choice of words is probably rooted in your temperament. But, history is on the side of the pessimist otherwise we would have solved this problem by now.
So go on ... poke fun. But there are at the very least- two joke lines going in this universe.
By the way. Do you think Putin is going to REALLY give up his power in 2008 when he is scheduled to step down and make way for a new president? Are you familiar with some of the more common tricks dictators use to make sure they stay in power? Do you remember how Putin came to power in the first place? Daniel 8:24