"Jehovah will first cause your heart to beat heavily.", "You then begin to sense the taste of blood in your mouth.", "And finally, you feel a distinct impression on your forehead."
Have you ever considered getting a "Frontal lobotomy?"
pseudo
in all of my postings i have sounded out a message of warning to all of those that cared to listen.
we are at the point where a warning is in the form of a solemn plea.
i am revealing to you a secret that most everyone has always asked.
"Jehovah will first cause your heart to beat heavily.", "You then begin to sense the taste of blood in your mouth.", "And finally, you feel a distinct impression on your forehead."
Have you ever considered getting a "Frontal lobotomy?"
pseudo
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
Leolaia,
I see the error of my logic (or lack of logic). Thanks for the clarification.
pseudo
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
afin,
There is absolutely nothing wrong with looking at the NT within its historical context. In order to do this it is necessary to look at non-canonical writings of the Jews prior to and during the first century. I never said that you had to base your faith on their content. If you refuse to examine how early Christians fit within the Jewish society of that time period, then that is your choice.
pseudo
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
afin,
Have you followed the links I gave you?
Here are a two abbreviated quotes from Jewish writings prior to the NT.
(17)After our death in this fashion Abraham and Isaac and Jacob will receive us, and all our forefathers will praise us." (18)And to each one of the brothers as they were dragged away, those who were left said, "Do not shame us, brother, nor be traitor to our brothers who have already died."(36)Then the place of torment shall appear, and over against it the place of rest; the furnace of hell shall be displayed, and on the opposite side the paradise of delight.
Follow the links, read the information, and come back with a reasonable argument in support of the NWT's placement of the comma.
pseudo
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/63386/973216/post.ashx#973216
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/63946/988434/post.ashx#988434
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
afin,
It only fits if Jesus and the criminal were still alive the next day. I pretty sure that you do not believe that they were.
Here are a couple of links to previous threads concerning the afterlife beliefs of the Jews prior to and during the first century.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/12/63386/973216/post.ashx#973216
http://www.jehovahs-witness.com/10/63946/988434/post.ashx#988434
pseudo
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
afin,
"I'm telling you tonight, it will rain tomorrow." (for instance').
A little better, but still not quite right.
Unfortunately it assumes that we will both be alive tomorrow to see if what you are telling me "tonight" is in-fact accurate. So it still does not quite fit.
Have you looked into what was commonly believed about the afterlife just prior to the first century?
pseudo
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
afin,
I'll give you a 'for instance'. Tonight, I am posting on this site. Does that mean there is some deep, mysterious reason I used the word tonight? I used a comma too.
Your example is not really equivalent to the manner in which the idiom was modified in Luke 23:43.
A better example would be something similar to the following:
?Dude I?m telling you tonight I am posting on this site.?
If you did not normally use commas and you constantly used the phrase ?Dude I?m telling you?, most people would recognize ?Dude I?m telling you? as an idiom and assume that a comma would normally follow the idiom. Unless there was some significant reason, the comma would always follow the idiom. So, the above phrase would read as follows:
?Dude I?m telling you, tonight I am posting on this site.?
It is not at all surprising that Jesus or the writer of Luke would have believed in a literal Hell. This is not to say that they believed exactly what many people today believe about Hell, but it is obvious that they were influenced by teachings that had become popular prior to the first century.
pseudo
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
afin,
There is really no need for Jesus to stress that he was telling this to the criminal on that "day". It's not like it was a casual conversation that they could resume on some other "day".
pseudo
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
afin,
In Sherry's comments( paragraph 4), above mine, is what I'm refering to. She felt that Jesus was saying that they would be in paradise that day.
Yes, that is how I understood your reference.
" amen legw soi " or " amen leqw umin " ( "Truly I tell you," or "Truly I tell YOU,") was a common idiom used by Jesus. If you will notice this phrase appears well over 60 times in the NWT. The Translators of the NWT chose to include the word "today" with the idiom in Luke 23:43. My question still stands: Why would Jesus find it necessary to change the idiom and stress that he was telling the criminal something on that "day"?
pseudo
maybe i'm just messed up, but i get really freaked out sometimes.
i can't understand the bible,.....in some places it seems like it's saying all you have to do is one or two things, then it seems like it's saying you have to do different things to be saved.... so many different people and religions have so many different takes on the bible.
i don't know which to beleive, and it scares me that if i beleived the wrong thing that i could go to hell, or just go to sleep forever as the witnesses say.
afin,
Why exactly would Jesus need to stress that he was telling this to the criminal on that day?
pseudo